Henkka
Registered User
When Scheifele just got 8 years x ~6 million, that would be a dumb contract to give out.
Max term makes sense, we have the comp’s to lock him in at a good price.
If player doesn't want a max term?
When Scheifele just got 8 years x ~6 million, that would be a dumb contract to give out.
Max term makes sense, we have the comp’s to lock him in at a good price.
If player doesn't want a max term?
If player doesn't want a max term?
Sorry, should have worded that differently, but I would push very hard for a max term deal.
I see way more pro’s than con’s with a 7/8 year deal as opposed to a 4/5 year deal with Larkin.
At the end of the day, it's up to the player.
At the end of the day, it's up to the player.
Of course we should avoid the length for straight to UFA, and usually Holland doesn't offer that as an option at all. He'll stay as RFA or will eat at least 1-2 UFA years after.
Right and while that's the case, Dylan Larkin has never given any indication that he's in a hurry to leave Detroit and very likely won't unless the Wings tried to crazy lowball him. If Larkin gets close to Schiefele's money, he'll have a hard time saying he was underpaid and certainly have no case for being wildly underpaid.
If they were like here's 2x2 AAV or 8x4AAV, I could see him breaking from the team. And frankly, 8x6 is 48M in real cash. It would be pretty dang hard to turn down ~50M guaranteed if it's already a place where he seems to want to be.
I think from the clubs point of view, Mantha doesn't really DRIVE a line. He's a good finisher and when he's on, he's on but he has work to do and I think thats why maybe he didnt get as much as he could have.
That and KH has all the cards when it comes to RFA signing. Hard to negotiate much better when you dont have much leverage.