njx9
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2016
- 2,161
- 340
Send Howard, Svechnikov, and a pick for Faulk and Mrazek.
Man, Mrazek would be pissed.
Not sure why we'd want him back, either.
Send Howard, Svechnikov, and a pick for Faulk and Mrazek.
Man, Mrazek would be pissed.
Not sure why we'd want him back, either.
It was a hypothetical scenario, and we all know how trade threads go around here. Besides, that was just a starting point.
I think there was real reason why Mrazek was wanted out from our lockerroom. He will never be back.
I think that the Canes are probably one more season, with all the changes that they are poised to make, from really competing. They are making massive shake up moves that is going to take time to gel across the roster. First year in a long time without Cam Ward as the goalie (which, by the way, they could have kept Ward for like half the price of Jimmy and they didn't want to); Faulk is going to be gone; Skinner is probably going to be gone; Svechnikov and maybe Necas will be pushing for prominent roles with limited professional experience; Hanifin+Lindholm were shipped out for Hamilton.
This is the same kind of roster turnover that the Cavs tried to do at the NBA trade deadline this year. There's no way they are Cup favorites this year, so pursuing an average goalie on the wrong side of 30 with no term doesn't scream "good idea" to me. I mean the return for Faulk is going to play a key role in the turnover they are going for; and the fact that they moved Lindholm and are probably moving Skinner, they are probably going to need to seek an impact forward; preferably a top 6 caliber center that can team with Necas down the middle to get the most out of Aho/Svech.
At this point I can't see a trade happening between DET and CAR without a defenseman going back to CAR, but they just picked up de Haan and that kind of negates CAR's need for a LHD. Unless DET can pawn off somebody on the back end to a different team, which seems doubtful.
I don't know, I can't even begin to speculate what happened to him.
While Ward and Howard are the same age, Howard is a much more stabilizing presence in the net. Maybe they'd take Jensen, who knows?
What it comes down to is this: I wouldn't mind Faulk on the team at all, and I'm just trying to find a way to make it work. My first thought was the goatlending issue, because like I said, Darling and Mrazek are going to be... special.
Eh, there's probably not much more point in discussing this aspect of a "trade," because I suck at these.
How does Faulk help us? He's 26, so he doesn't really fit our window.
He's mediocre in his own zone and produces like Mike Green. Sure, maybe he bounces back, but you can't bet on that.
As long as we don't give up more than Athanasiou, Svechnikov, and a 2nd round pick I'm okay with it, I just don't see the point.
That's all well and good, but if the price is too high I don't want to make that move.Imo, he would fit very well on our window. There has to be some experienced guys playing in front of our 20-year old kids. Those enter prime in proably 5-6 years, then Faulk can give the torch to others and drop to lower pair.
Better to have two Mike Greens, than one. He is a righty. That's most important. I could trade all our lefties for one righty. We have been lacking good righties since Rafalski retired. Damn tough to find. Pull the trigger when there's a slightest chance.
Carolina needs centers after losing Ryan and Lindholm. The prospect of Athanasiou being better suited at center* and Helm with some money retained would be inciting to them. Add Svechnikov to re-unite the brothers and add value and you've got a deal that makes a lot of sense.Faulk would certainly be good for us but I don't see the Hurricanes having much interest in any of our pieces. Larkin is an obvious no-go and I wouldn't want to move Mantha for Faulk.
I would consider Nyquist + AA but Gus has an NTC and only one year left and AA isn't all that enticing in a trade scenario. Probably better served shopping Nyquist at the deadline with retention hoping to get a late 1st.
Add Svechnikov to re-unite the brothers
If I'm Carolina, that trade package has about as much value to me as a tennis shoe with no laces. Faulk will command either a higher caliber of player, a first round pick, or both.Athanasiou+Helm ($850k retained)+Svechnikov for Faulk.
I'm not saying that adds value, but Evgeni as a prospect has value. Should have clarified.This has absolutely no value to anyone in real life.
I think you're over-valuing Faulk. He's basically Mike Green but 26. He's bad in his own zone and was sheltered because of it, getting 58% of his even strength starts in the offensive zone, also most of his production was on the power play. Without Faulk Carolina has...If I'm Carolina, that trade package has about as much value to me as a tennis shoe with no laces. Faulk will command either a higher caliber of player, a first round pick, or both.
Also, if the rumors of Carolina wanting Saad are true, then here are some stats for you.If I'm Carolina, that trade package has about as much value to me as a tennis shoe with no laces. Faulk will command either a higher caliber of player, a first round pick, or both.
According to Cap Friendly, Carolina only has 3 centers, Staal, Rask, and Teravainen. Teravainen is like Athanasiou in that he hasn't played center in a while, so I'd rather have two guys who might be able to play center in case one of them can't. Helm for only $3mil is a good bottom 6 center and makes them harder to play against, which is one of their goals this offseason. We may not see eye-to-eye on the value of these players, but it doesn't warrant your hyperbolic claim that none they would scoff at this offer.
This has absolutely no value to anyone in real life.
It has value to Andrei Svechnikov, their cornerstone player, which gives it an intangible value to Carolina. It certainly isn't something they are going out of their way to buy, but I am willing to bet that no trade with Carolina is made without Evgeny going the other way.