The players look frustrated and likely for multiple reasons.
Those expected to score aren't, those who are playmakers don't seem to have compatible finishers to play with or when they do they have a third who doesn't fit.
It's no secret I'm not a fan of a lot of our vets but that doesn't mean they can't or don't have a role or that they can't be productive. As much a the rookies aren't being used well, this year and in the past the vets are being used just as poorly.
Purboo needs to develop his game in other areas, that's a given but he needs to be in a position to do so as well. Using him the way he has, expecting him to bring more while not putting him a situation where he can benefit from playing with players he is compatible with is as much a disservice to him as it is to his current linemates and the rest of the team.
The most consistent line for much of last season was D'Amico/Angle/Purboo. They were the top line and while they certainly are not a true number one line they worked well together. They went cold or at least D'Amico and Purboo went cold while Angle started scoring. It was great to see Angle develop more offense in his game but the cost was two players who lost all their ability to contribute offensively. Letowski shook things up and things were never the same. Angle needs a more balance approach to have a bigger impact. He's opportunistic which is great but he's started looking for his own opportunities while not looking to create when there is a chance for others. He's capable of doing both but last year and this year he's been one extreme or another. He either set up others up, at times not taking the chance when he had the best opportunity to now he's taking the chance regardless of there being an opportunity for himself or not and when he does look to move the puck there is no play to be made. He needs to find the right balance. He's a solid player, still not and never will be a number centre in the league but he is a solid number two who can contribute more when he fully utilizes his linemates as well as understands when to do it alone and when not to. I would like to see those three back together again. D'Amico has had no success with anyone else and if him and Angle can start clicking again like last year but with Angle knowing when to pass and when not to they can work well with Purboo and the familiarity would help Purboo expand his game IMO.
I think McDonald and Cuylle would well together if they can get them a centre who is a solid playmaker. Cuylle is shoot first, that's when he is effective while McDonald can bring what I think many hoped Purboo would. The difference is McDonald is a better skater, has the speed to keep up with better players and is capable of being a bit more creative while also playing along the boards and behind the net with the ability to recover if he loses a battle. Can Johnston and Zito, who I am still fine with rotating for a bit longer but can they fill that role? That's the big question mark IMO. If they can then move them up with Cuylle and McDonal. If any threesome on any night of Maggio/Johnston/Zito and McDonald can be your most consistent, in limited minutes but still getting some challenging minutes most night then I would give Cuylle/Zito or Johnston/McDonald a try for a few games. The vets aren't working out on a line with Cuylle, they're either playing a me first style or you end up with Boka up there who is not a top nine player at this point on this team. He may be on another team but he has never worked well with younger players, his style has been too different from the kids coming up and the younger players have been more offense oriented so he becomes an anchor.
If they went to these two lines, D'Amico/Angle/Purboo and Cuylle/Zito or Johnston/McDonald that would likely give them a strong middle six and if their top line struggles D'Amico/Angle/Purboo are capable of moving up into that top line role as needed. They probably won't be as effective but they can minimize another teams top line as we saw last year.
Put Maggio with Afanasyev and Foudy together for a couple of games and see what you get. Maggio has shown he can keep up but he has also been playing limited minutes with three other rookies or second year McDonald. Let's see how he does with a couple of higher end players. Either him or McDonald would be fine after a few games on this line and no, I don't think either could be considered first line wingers at this point but they don't have a vet. With Afanasyev having a bit of size and skill I think McDonald bringing the extra size and skill would fit better with Cuylle/Zito or Johnston. The expectations on Foudy and Afanasyev are top line roles and Maggio should be able to keep up while Cuylle brings a solid scoring threat to get Zito and Johnston going in bigger roles while we know McDonald, while lacking experience can play in this league.
That leaves Douglas/Playfair/Boka. Playfair and Boka are both fourth line/PK players on this team and while Douglas is capable of more he is developing a PK game and can be effective on the PP where Playfair and Boka should never be. These three taking a reduced role five on five take the bulk of the PK work. They all also have enough experience to move up and down whe nit's needed, play those tough minutes when protecting a lead etc. Douglas should be capable of more but right now he doesn't seem to be fitting anywhere and if they are going to keep him they need a way to get him going. As for the fit Boka and to a lesser extent Playfair are crash and bang type players while Douglas, even with his size doesn't work out well along the boards if he's one on one with someone. In a scrum he's fine, there's enough players to hold him up but when he's one on one he loses more battles than he wins. Boka and Playfair are the opposite, they will win more than they lose but they struggle to finish where we know Douglas can finish if someone can set him up or give him space.
Keeping the roster as is isn't the best use of assets, even making changes. It would be improved IMO but when you have two 19 year olds and an OA on your fourth line you either have to be loaded in the top nine with talent or realize there's a problem with how the pieces fit together. As I've said before, the younger kid are one style of player and the vets are something else with very little crossover between the two older and younger players. It's two completely different teams yet Letowski insists on just putting a vet with years of service with a kid or two and throws all the lines out of whack.
If the lines I laid out were used he would have multiple options to run with on any given night in his top nine in terms of who is playing first/second/third line roles with their respective combinations. With Playfair/Boka/Douglas as a non typical fourth line who could and should play more than a typical fourth line but certainly fewer minutes beyond the PK than the other three he will have a fourth line that could be rolled regularly and depending on who, if anyone is struggling he has someone from that line who could be moved up the line up when required.
Ideally they would upgrade a couple of their vets but not likely being a contending year I wouldn't want to see assets moved for a one and done player. I would rather acclimate the kids to the league in bigger roles while using the vets in more strategic roles. If they want to make a bigger push than go hard after a two year player if they think next year is a contending year or go after an 02 who will be here for three years. They have the assets for the right move and they have the pieces to move to add a few more but if anyone is moved they need to be replaced. If all they do is ride things out then get the chemistry right with who you currently have and stop trying to force a vet into a role where it doesn't benefit them or the kids they are being put with.