chilimac
Registered User
Well, I didnt give much thought beforehand to how long the appeal meeting might last, but 7 hours ? I think thats ...uh..impressive. Until I hear otherwise I'm going to assume Tom's legal team put on a thorough presentaion. The explanation given by the league when they handed down the suspension clearly stated that the 20 games were warranted because this latest hit was Tom's fourth in 'x-number of games', and that rate was 'unprecedented',,,yadda...yadday..yadda. As far as I'm concerned, that means Tom certainly has the right to go back and critique each of those hits and claim the league was in error on any, or all of them. I would imagine that process would consume a few hours at least. I seem to remember at least one of the preseason hits from last season as being not that egregious in my opinion. Then we have the seemingly inconsistent way suspenions are, or are not doled out in the NHL, and that could have been a couple more hours of presentation. Or, maybe, they all just got liquored up in the commissioners office and played texas holdem' for 5 or 6 hours...i dont know! If I'm Tom, Im already planning to take this to arbitration , or at least thats what I want the league to think...