You say it was clearly meant as tongue cheek but then also agree that people actually believe that???? How is one supposed to decipher between those and how is that clear?? Lol come on. Such a stupid agrument nonetheless. Leave subjective thoughts out of the title, especially stupid ones.the OP removed it because people are sensitive.
the fact of the matter is - the team's objective is to show that we do not need Nylander. thus removing all leverage from his camp.
there are some people who believe we don't need him and we should trade him to improve the team. that's been pretty much a common opinion for a LOT of people.
if people want to get worked up on that, then whatever. but the title was not childish or embarrassing. it was clearly meant as tongue in cheek, and if happens to coincide with what some people believe, okay - but who cares?