Will Supreme Court open a ‘dam burst’ of legalized sports betting

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,904
99,365
Cambridge, MA
The landscape has changed in 25 years. Today most of your major Vegas casinos have locations across the country. Many of them have built 'racebooks' that focus on horse racing but can easily be made into a sportsbook.

Today the major sports leagues in the US simply want a piece of the action.
 

David Dennison

I'm a tariff, man.
Jul 5, 2007
5,940
1,444
Grenyarnia
The landscape has changed in 25 years. Today most of your major Vegas casinos have locations across the country. Many of them have built 'racebooks' that focus on horse racing but can easily be made into a sportsbook.

Today the major sports leagues in the US simply want a piece of the action.

Yeah, the NFL and MLB hold stakes in Draftkings/Fanduel/etc, whose whole business model is to exploit a loophole in the online gambling laws. I guess when you have 60 or so billionaires on one side if the issue, the law tends to go that way. Shocking, I know.
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,904
99,365
Cambridge, MA
Major U.S. sports leagues hedging their bets on legal gambling | Toronto Star

WASHINGTON—In court, all four major U.S. sports leagues are fighting New Jersey’s challenge to the federal ban on sports gambling, which the Supreme Court will hear next week.

Outside of court, leaders of three of the four leagues have made public comments that suggest they wouldn’t mind losing the case. Only the NFL has been steadfast in its opposition to gambling, a stance that critics see as hypocritical, especially as the Raiders plan a move to a billion-dollar stadium just off the Las Vegas Strip.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,353
12,727
South Mountain
Major U.S. sports leagues hedging their bets on legal gambling | Toronto Star

WASHINGTON—In court, all four major U.S. sports leagues are fighting New Jersey’s challenge to the federal ban on sports gambling, which the Supreme Court will hear next week.

Outside of court, leaders of three of the four leagues have made public comments that suggest they wouldn’t mind losing the case. Only the NFL has been steadfast in its opposition to gambling, a stance that critics see as hypocritical, especially as the Raiders plan a move to a billion-dollar stadium just off the Las Vegas Strip.

The sad situation is the big league maneuvers now are all about how they can make a buck off of gambling on their sport. If New Jersey wins then the major sports league don't get anything.

I'm thinking Adam Silvers long term goal with legalizing more gambling is how the NBA can get a cut of that gambling action.
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,904
99,365
Cambridge, MA
The sad situation is the big league maneuvers now are all about how they can make a buck off of gambling on their sport. If New Jersey wins then the major sports league don't get anything.

I'm thinking Adam Silvers long term goal with legalizing more gambling is how the NBA can get a cut of that gambling action.

@mouser Wynn is currently building a casino less than 3 miles from downtown Boston at a cost of $2.5 BILLION. You know they want a sportsbook in Massachusetts badly.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,353
12,727
South Mountain
@mouser Wynn is currently building a casino less than 3 miles from downtown Boston at a cost of $2.5 BILLION. You know they want a sportsbook in Massachusetts badly.

I'm sure they'd love to have a sportsbook. Still, when you do the math the slot machines and tables games are more profitable then a sportsbook so I doubt it's that critical to the Wynn business model to get sports betting in there.
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,904
99,365
Cambridge, MA
I'm sure they'd love to have a sportsbook. Still, when you do the math the slot machines and tables games are more profitable then a sportsbook so I doubt it's that critical to the Wynn business model to get sports betting in there.

I am astounded Wynn is betting so much on a Boston casino. I can see the hotel rising from my place and while their website promises glorious views from the rooms

WYNN BOSTON HARBOR

The reality

cas1-13033asdf-7441-7513.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG and Killion

Cyclones Rock

Registered User
Jun 12, 2008
10,591
6,498
Wonder how legalization of sports gambling would affect Vegas economy.

As the betting 'action' gets distributed throughout the country, Vegas is going to obviously get less of it. While the overall amount bet on sports would jump significantly, there would be no reason for individuals or bookies to go to Vegas to bet or lay off sports bets.

I'm pretty sure it would impact the Vegas economy negatively, but I don't know to what extent. I would think that casinos make most of their money on slots and table games and that sports book is a relatively small piece of the profit pie, so I don't think it would crash the Vegas economy, but there would be a neglible to noticeable drag upon it. People who'd fly out to Vegas to place substanial bets wouldn't be renting hotel rooms and spending money in restaurants, etc. anymore in addition to not placing their bets in Sin City. I'd guess that those sports betters who wouldn't be coming to Vegas anymore (or as regularly) also played some table games and slots as well, so there would be some effect on that part of the Vegas equation as well.
 
Last edited:

sbjnyc

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
5,959
2,022
New York
People tend to bet on their local teams (VGK is a prime example of this) so would sportbooks in different markets keep different odds in each location? Currently the larger sportsbooks don't do that. How will the offshore sportsbooks influence this?
 

tony d

Registered User
Jun 23, 2007
76,594
4,555
Behind A Tree
Will be interesting to see what happens Re: Vegas. Given they should have 2 major sports teams by 2020 or 2021 I think that'll help their economy should they lose anything from the casinos. In any event Vegas sells itself so personally I think they'll be fine regardless of what may happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,904
99,365
Cambridge, MA
Looks a lot like 200 years after a post-nuclear apocalypse.

It is the largest private construction job in Massachusetts history. It just shows how much casinos take in.

I admit I would love to spend an afternoon watching football in a sportsbook.
 

LeHab

Registered User
Aug 31, 2005
15,957
6,259
Wonder how legalization of sports gambling would affect Vegas economy.

A quick google shows about 4 billions waged per year recently on sports with a return of 95% to betters. They already face stiff competition from underground local and online gambling. Was expecting total wagers to be higher. As for actual impact, who knows..
 

njdevsfn95

Help JJJ, Sprite.
Jul 30, 2006
31,348
55
I'm not much of a sports gambler but find it ridiculous that I can drive 90minutes and put my house on black but can't bet $5 on the Devils (legally).

Actually, depending on the casino, I might be able to be my house online.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devonator

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,353
12,727
South Mountain
I hope that NJ prevails. Not so much that I care about the betting aspects, but more that the whole federal law seems very arbitrary and unconstitutional to me. Dictating that some states can allow a specific type of business while others cannot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cutchemist42

cutchemist42

Registered User
Apr 7, 2011
6,706
221
Winnipeg
I hope that NJ prevails. Not so much that I care about the betting aspects, but more that the whole federal law seems very arbitrary and unconstitutional to me. Dictating that some states can allow a specific type of business while others cannot.

The Twitter commentators who followed it live are saying they feel PASPA will be 6-3 in striking it down. If you are the leagues, are you pissed after putting money into DFS? I think people like single game betting more.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,353
12,727
South Mountain
The Twitter commentators who followed it live are saying they feel PASPA will be 6-3 in striking it down. If you are the leagues, are you pissed after putting money into DFS? I think people like single game betting more.

Having a hobby of following and reading many Supreme Court rulings I’ve learned to be very cautious over predicting how the various Supremes will decide. Especially if the prognosticators are basing their opinions on how the different justices questioned the two sides in court.

It’s not uncommon for a justice to appear to be questioning and challenging one side of a case harder then the other yet still rule for that same side. Presumably laying the groundwork for their ruling through the harder questioning.

p.s. I still agree there’s a high probability PASPA gets overturned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cutchemist42

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad