Why was Scott Stevens left off 2002 Canada's Olympic Team?

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Real Gudbranson, Oct 24, 2013.

View Users: View Users
  1. Real Gudbranson

    Real Gudbranson Playoff Bound

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    4,134
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Nanaimo B.C
    I don't understand, he was the captain of NJ at the time and was one of the best D-men of those years. Why was Stevens left off?
     
  2. I Hate Chris Butler

    I Hate Chris Butler Backlund Fan Club

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2008
    Messages:
    18,775
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Occupation:
    Lowly Clerk
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    Who was he going to replace? It was Stevens' worst offensive season and his defensive game wasn't better than anyone on the team to warrant replacing them with Stevens.
     
  3. TigerTheLion

    TigerTheLion Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2013
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    46
    I seem to remember reading an article from around the time the roster was announced that said management was focused on bringing in speed and skill. Stevens wouldn't have worked with a roster like that.
     
  4. TheDevilMadeMe

    TheDevilMadeMe Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,306
    Likes Received:
    1,282
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Awards:
    Stevens slowed down a lot around 2001 or 2002.. Still better defensively than almost anyone, but not necessary better overall
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2013
  5. mrhockey193195

    mrhockey193195 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    246
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Had the olympics been one year before, Stevens would have made it for sure.
     
  6. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,248
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    229
    He was turning 38 that year as well. MacInnis was going to be 39 in 2002 as it was and he was still good enough to make the team. They wanted to bring in youth on the team as well and they had enough young defensemen in the mold of Redden, Jovanovski, Morris and Brewer to choose from. Foote who was a Team Canada stalwart had just played brilliantly in 2001 when Colorado won the Cup and he could easily fill in the defensive role.

    In 1998 Stevens was on the Olympic team. In 2000 had their been a World Cup he's there as well. But two years after that? This is when Niedermayer was starting to finally surpass him as the better defenseman and he made more sense on the team. They wanted speed on the team as well, something lacking in 1998.

    In the end, the 2002 defense looked like:
    Pronger, Blake, MacInnis, Foote, Niedermayer, Jovanovski and Brewer

    No one really complained at that time.
     
  7. quoipourquoi

    quoipourquoi Goaltender

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,044
    Likes Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    119
    Location:
    Hockeytown, MI
    So they could blame Eric Brewer if they lost. :sarcasm:



    Scott Stevens wasn't even in the top-nine names by the end of 2001. Call me sentimental, but I would have had him on the team. Guy just went to two-straight Finals, but people were only focusing on how brutal the Devils looked at the beginning of 2001-02, as if it wasn't going to turn-around (Stevens was a -8 at the time of selection). It probably could have knocked Brodeur down to the #3 spot too (.895 at the time), but Sean Burke **** the bed in back-to-back games days before they picked the team, including once where the selection committee was in attendance.
     
  8. Psycho Papa Joe

    Psycho Papa Joe Porkchop Hoser

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    23,347
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Forensic Accountant
    Location:
    Cesspool, Ontario
    Home Page:
    Looking at that roster, it really shows how disappointing the careers of Redden, Jovanovski and Brewer ended up being. They were supposed to be the next Neids, Pronger and Blake and other than some flashes here and there, they have been disappointments. Hopefully this next generation, with the likes of Subban, Doughty, Pieterangelo and Keith fare better long term.
     
  9. Sticks and Pucks

    Sticks and Pucks Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,133
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    101
    They only needed one guy who played his style and they ended up choosing Foote which was the right choice.
     
  10. Dissonance

    Dissonance Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Cabbage Patch
    Home Page:
    Part of it was a reaction to the previous Olympics.

    In 1998 the Canadian team had a bunch of grinders and solid defense-first players--Rob Zamuner, Shayne Corson, Scott Stevens. It didn't go so well.

    So when 2002 rolled around, Gretzky and co. wanted to emphasize offense and bring in defensemen who could skate well on the bigger international rinks and join the rush.

    But part of it was that Stevens' play was faltering that season--same goes for Eric Desjardins, who was another surprising omission.
     
  11. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,248
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    229
    This was also one of those times when a youth movement was blended into a veteran team and did it well. The younger defensemen chosen over Stevens were picked for some youth, but also picked because they were actually good enough to make the team. Brewer and Jovanovski, hard to believe, were very good defensemen at this time.

    I also think Stevens was better in 2000 than 2001. Not by a lot, but he was insane in the 2000 playoffs. He still had that "factor" about him in 2001 but his ability to take a game over was starting to slip a bit, as it should at that age. The right choices were made, the 2002 team was a quick team built on transition and moving the puck up the ice. Stevens did a lot of great things, but by this point of his career, that wasn't his forte.
     
  12. quoipourquoi

    quoipourquoi Goaltender

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,044
    Likes Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    119
    Location:
    Hockeytown, MI
    It was an amazing turn-around where the Canada went from 4-1-1 in 1998 (19 GF, 8 GA) to 4-1-1 in 2002 (22 GF, 14 GA). :sarcasm:
     
  13. Eisen

    Eisen Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,343
    Likes Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Duesseldorf
    Stevens hitting doesn't translate well into the Olympics. And that was his greatest strength.
     
  14. Hardyvan123

    Hardyvan123 [email protected]

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    17,552
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    It was a bit of a lull for Dmen, still a hangover affect of the game changing so much to a defensive mistake free one first for Dmen in the mid 90's.

    The Dmen group of the early 2010ish era looks like it could be the best ever IMO.
     
  15. vadim sharifijanov

    vadim sharifijanov ugh

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    17,066
    Likes Received:
    1,498
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Home Page:
    being that all four of those guys have already peaked higher than redden, jovo, and brewer ever did, i'm not so worried.
     
  16. Dissonance

    Dissonance Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,535
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Cabbage Patch
    Home Page:
    Ha, I don't think I'd ever realized those were the actual stat lines. Funny what the difference between an embarrassing national failure and a rousing success amounts to.
     
  17. Eisen

    Eisen Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,343
    Likes Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Duesseldorf
    It's clearly a decline. The differential is worse.
     
  18. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,248
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    229
    Team Canada 2002 improved with every game. Goal scoring was not a problem for them once they got their feet wet. In 1998 it was a problem.

    2002 is unique where as it seems like this is a team that would have lost 5 games if it played 100 more. That's how good I think they looked against the Americans. The climaxed the way a team is supposed to. 1998 was a team built solely to beat the Americans. So yeah, it was a significant difference in teams.
     
  19. quoipourquoi

    quoipourquoi Goaltender

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    8,044
    Likes Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    119
    Location:
    Hockeytown, MI
    Or maybe it has little to do with the exchange of Scott Stevens and company for Eric Brewer and a lot more to do with playing Belarus in the semifinals instead of the Czech Republic? Belarus let in 32 goals in the other five games they played in the 2002 tournament; the Czech Republic let in just 5 goals in their other five games in 1998. Canada in 1998 beat Belarus by a large margin in round robin play, and Canada in 2002 still couldn't beat the Czech Republic when they met them in round robin, so nothing really changed there except the order in which they played the teams. Still couldn't score more than two on Finland in 2002. Still beat the USA by a three-goal margin. Scored more on Sweden in 1998. Beat Kazakhstan in a blowout in 1998 but barely beat Germany in 2002.

    Canada in 2002 isn't some magical team that learned how to gel under the tutelage of an Emilio Estevez or a Kurt Russell.



    Interesting note: Wayne Gretzky made up his mind about four of the defensemen in early 2001. Scott Stevens would go on to be the Norris Trophy nominee at the end of the season (along with the retiring Ray Bourque) while the four players Gretzky mentioned were having injury problems and holdouts in 2001. Stevens wouldn't have looked out of place to have been named at the time.

     
  20. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,248
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    229
    As I said, this was a team that improved within each game. 2002 was a far different team than 1998. 2010 did the same thing. Heck, now that we're on topic, 1972 did the same thing. Lots of Canadian teams don't just jump out of the gate. Sometimes it takes a while. With this team it took a while. The final game against the Americans showed this. That team really should have put the game to bed in the second period. Mario somehow hitting the post, Fleury deking out the American defenseman, pulling a move on Richter that made him lose his glove and then losing the puck. A 5-on-3 in the 2nd period. How USA managed to come out of the second period with just a 3-2 deficit is beyond me. Remember, they played only 6 games, not a lot of time to get used to each other but they played their best game against the next best team at the most important time. And to look at the names on that roster, it is hard to believe it wouldn't have happened that way. This team was clearly the best team on paper in this tournament, and as we saw, on the ice as well.
     
  21. tony d

    tony d Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    67,977
    Likes Received:
    1,617
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Office Worker
    Location:
    Behind A Tree
    He was going to be 38 that year and at the twilight of his career, his best days where behind him more or less.
     
  22. billybudd

    billybudd 1for the other thumb

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    20,973
    Likes Received:
    811
    Trophy Points:
    139
    I never really understood people's love affairs with Brewer (and Morris) at the time. A non-zero number of people around the game seemed to be under the impression they'd wake up one day and Brewer would have transformed into a meaner Raymond Bourque overnight.

    It was so strange. I never saw anything from him that indicated this was even a remote possibility. Jovanovski, yeah. He very occasionally would show flashes of brilliance. But Brewer was sort of just a guy doing his job adequately and never looked capable of more than that, to me at least.
     
  23. monster_bertuzzi

    monster_bertuzzi registered user

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    32,734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Home Page:
    Brewer made the team because of Kevin Lowe's input only, Redden was clearly a notch ahead in 2001-2002.
     
  24. billybudd

    billybudd 1for the other thumb

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    20,973
    Likes Received:
    811
    Trophy Points:
    139
    I'm sure Redden was, but Kevin Lowe wasn't the only person trying to sell Brewer as a franchise D in the making. The very notion of anyone believing that at the time confused the Hell out of me.
     
  25. JA

    JA Guest

    I think most of the reasons have been stated here already, but here are a few articles from between November 2001 and January 2002 to complement what has been said and give us a clear picture of what Hockey Canada's reasoning was:
    A combination of Stevens' less-than-impressive play prior to the roster selection, an emphatic desire from Hockey Canada to approach their team differently than they did in 1998, and age kept the veteran defenseman off the 2002 Team Canada roster. Gretzky and co wanted a quicker team and didn't feel Stevens would fit their needs at the time.
     
    Last edited by moderator : Oct 28, 2013

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"