Why not Iginla?

[Otherworld]

Iginla had great chemistry with Krejci. I think a line with Iggy, Krejci, and Pasta would look great in this line up.

As long as we don't break the bank, a one year deal makes sense and adds to the leadership needed for the youngsters.

Click to read more...

 

[LSCII]

Why not <insert any former marginal Bruins player here> instead?

Isn't the point to finally get some of the youth up here to see if they can actually contribute at this level? Bringing in a guy like Iggy is simply the wrong way to go, imo...

 

[Midship]

Because he's old and stuff

 

[Don Cherry]

I could get on board with bringing in Iginla for the year. Great player who may have some gas left in the tank. I wonder how close to game shape he's in?

 

[LSCII]

Because he's old and stuff

Not only that, but don't they already have enough aging and declining players on the roster?

 

[Hali33]

What year is it?

 

[LSCII]

Has anyone seen what kind of shape Peverley is in? He was good here 6 years ago. May be worth a flier, no?

 

[Don Cherry]

Has anyone seen what kind of shape Peverley is in? He was good here 6 years ago. May be worth a flier, no?

Yeah because Peverley and Iginla are clearly on the same level.

 

[smithformeragent]

I wish we had this guy two years ago.

We did.

Four years ago then.

 

[Don Cherry]

Not only that, but don't they already have enough aging and declining players on the roster?

Other than Bergeron, Backes and Chara? Those three are in decline making HUGE money. Iginla for a sane wage might be a good add.

 

[Gee Wally]

Yeah, we aint doing this.