Do_The_Trotsky
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2007
- 124
- 0
I'm only 20 so I'm not old enough to remember the circumstances behind it. Any insight?
I'm only 20 so I'm not old enough to remember the circumstances behind it. Any insight?
The NHL did not make any attempt to intervene and in some respects was silently glad that a once in a lifetime superstar was leaving a frozen hockey outpost like Edmonton for the bright lights of LA.
The Kings gave up their putrid purple and yellow sweaters
I'm only 20 so I'm not old enough to remember the circumstances behind it. Any insight?
Oilers owner Peter Pocklington needed money to help his failing businesses outside of hockey. When he agreed to sell Gretzky to LA, the conversation started like this:
"The deal MUST include $15 million in cash. And, throw in some players"
How could the Oilers ever win a deal like that?
You guys are making Jimmy Carson out to be some kind of scrub. Although he failed in fulfilling a spectacular career, Carson was a bona fide young star at the time and is comparable with an elite talent like the contemporary Malkin or Kopitar. At 19 year old, Jimmy Carson scored 55 goals and 107 and was also LA's leading scorer in the playoffs with 8 points in 5 games. It is unfortunate that a leg injury shattered much of his speed and agility. Also, the Oilers drafted pretty horrifically with their picks from the trade. Had Carson and those draft picks materialized, the Oilers would've been dominant for a long time even after the Gretzky trade.
Its about time somebody mentioned this. This had potential to be the smartest hockey move of all time, but poor drafting and an unforseeable decline in Carson ruined that.
Dealing Gretzky could never have been a smart move. Carson could have scored 50 goals per season for the next decade, he was not the kind of player that could lead the Oilers to Stanley Cup glory. His attitude problems led to his exit from Edmonton.
Considering the boost Gretzky gave the Kings, the 1st rounders were in the bottom half and those are a crap shoot.
There is no way the Oilers could have won that deal.
And that's the final word on that. Ogo says so.
As it turned out, Gretzky had six more years of superstar-level output in him, and five more years point-per-game output after that, totalling 1126 points. Add his final, least productive season onto that and you get 1188, which as of today would've been good enough for 44th on the all-time scoring list.Its about time somebody mentioned this. This had potential to be the smartest hockey move of all time, but poor drafting and an unforseeable decline in Carson ruined that.
I remember hearing somewhere that Gretzky had to chose between Detroit and LA and preferred LA because they were underdogs or something.
Wayne Gretzky wept at his press conference, a pretty bold move in the macho world of hockey.
No, there's no way with what they got back that the trade could ever have worked out as a smart hockey move.