thinkwild said:
Well, fair depends on how you re looking at it. In the sense you are saying, that all 30 teams dont have a fair shot at Crosby, well you're right. But this is a case where that isnt fair. What is fair, is an uneven playing field. Where the weakest rebuilding teams get the first shot at the top talent. Its also an incentive for team like NYR or Wash to tear down and rebuild. You will have a chance at the young top prospects in the first picks. Which is what you need to build a franchise around. Young stars to grow with.
So in the sense that a fair system i one where teams cycle from rebuilding through greatness and back, this is fair.
False. What the draft does is reward bad teams for making bad choices. If the Washington Capitals and New York Rangers are ripping things apart because they've made bad choices over the years, then no, they don't deserve any shot at getting a Crosby. You're telling me that if a team messes up and continues to mess up for years and then finally decides "oh wait, we made a bad decision, we better tear down and rebuild" is acceptable? I don't think so. Hey, if that were the case, Detroit, Toronto, Philadelphia, Ottawa, Vancouver, New York I, Dallas, etc....should have done the same thing. They didn't though and they sucked it up and still put together awesome teams. How? Through smart asset management. Why shouldn't these teams be rewarded? Why should these teams have no chance at getting a player like Crosby, Brule, etc.......? Because they know how to put together a good team. Please. Oh, and then on top of it, we're asking these teams who generate revenue ON THEIR OWN to chip in and help out other teams that can't generate the revenue they make.
thinkwild said:
Yes you get free agent walk ons, certain college loopholes whichcan be fixed, etc, so its true, its not just drafting but however you get young prospects and develop them or trade for them or sign them as walk ons or late picks from Europe, whatever. But these are generally not the high priced UFAs, they are young relatively cheaper players to build with. THat you will develop into a contender before they become expensive UFAs at which time you must be winning to keep them.
Im trying to make the distinction that UFAs can co-exist and Edmonton neednt fear its strategy of developing is unfairly disadvantaged in doing what it needs to do regardless of what rich teams want to do with their UFAs.
With regards to the Edmontons, the Calgarys, the Ottawas, the Vancouvers, the Montreals, the Tampa Bays, the Phoenixs, etc.....I'll be honest, I have no pity for any of those teams. Let's spell it out. Edmonton had been mismanaged for years by Peter Pocklington. Pocklington sold assets from his team to finance his other business and political ventures. The league under then president John Zeigler could have done something, but failed to. When Pocklington sold the team, he sold the team to oil barons. That's right oil barons, worth billions. Rather than use the team as a tax write off to start in order to get out of debt, they tried a business approach on paying off the debt load year by year. If they would have bitten the bullet and paid everything up front, Edmonton would have generated revenue again. Of course, the other issue with Edmonton was that Glen Sather began to lose it as a talent evaluator. Poor draft choices came back to haunt him. Enter Kevin Lowe. Kevin Lowe has done a magnificent job in Edmonton and he should be held up highly for that. However, the oil baron owners have failed him. And having 13 owners to report to is rediculous. That to me is the ultimate sign of mismanagement. If you need 13 owners to run an organization, you're in a lot of trouble.
As for Calgary, the same can be said. Poor trading, poor drafting, poor management choices. Not spending money wisely, playing in an older facility, and once again, oil baron managers that don't have a clue doesn't help matters any.
Look, we can go on and on, but while all the blame is placed on players and how players need to make the sacrifice, why does nothing ever get mentioned about the bad mismanagement of some teams and owners who just don't have a clue. That is what bugs me about all of this. Yeah, players need to be more accomodating. However, when you have owners who aren't willing to budge, why should the players negotiate.