Who's our 6th best current prospect?

[Henkka]

1. RW - Filip Zadina, 93.2%
2. C/LW - Michael Rasmussen, 63.0%
3. RD - Filip Hronek, 64.9%
4. LD - Dennis Cholowski, 60.0%
5. C - Joe Veleno, 47.7%

Libor Sulak is the add.

Click to read more...

 

[NickH8]

Berggren, all the way. Old school hockey guys like his tenacity and new school hockey guys like his skill, that's a great combo.

Add Alec Regula.

 

[Frk It]

Going with Berggren, he is the type of guy I have been begging Wright to draft outside of the 1st round.

I think Svech can still turn it around, but he has to show me something first.

+Add Chase Pearson

 

[Fowler524]

Add Setkov

 

[ricky0034]

Berggren,add Regula

Berggren represents the only change in the top 10 I made after the draft from the development camp,originally I had my top 10 split into 4 tiers with Berggren with Svech in the 3rd one but now am leaning towards having him in the 2nd one instead,still 6th in both cases but a change nonetheless

still wish that pick had been another Defenseman though was just wrong using the first three picks on forwards,but I digress

 

[Henkka]

Svechnikov time. Never seen Berggren even play, hah.

 

[ChadS]

Berggren

Add Saarijärvi, he's got all the tools to put up a big season in GR.

I have nothing against Svech but he had a bad season for someone expected to be a producer in the NHL. Outperformed by Turgeon and Campbell, same production as Holmström. His previous season was great but we can't just look past what happened in 17-18.

 

[lilidk]

Again preseason will show who is better. If Svechnikov improve his skating he would be in top 5 or 3. I choose Hicketts simply because he was the best one out of GR last year.

 

[Hen Kolland]

Svechnikov again. I think there's way too much recency bias favoring Berggren and opposing Svechnikov. Berggren is the shiny new toy and he had a good development camp that everyone had the chance to see, which obviously makes people excited, but I don't think Svech just magically forgot how to play hockey; expecting a bounce back year for Evgeny.

 

[Henkka]

Looks like some ADHD people did vote Berggren 7 times in 1 minute after I opened the topic.

Now Svechnikov has catched the lead.

This will be tight.

 

[HisNoodliness]

I went with Berggren. I was slower to drop Svechnikov down my list than many, but he really struggled this year. Even last year he had a slow start in the AHL (before a good second half) and then an even worse sophomore season. He's struggled in 3 out of 4 of his half seasons in the AHL. I still have hope he can find his game, but he's given me reasons to be skeptical.

Berggren was a favorite of mine in the draft and checks all of the boxes for me: fast, tenacious, and skilled enough to make big plays. He finds a way to stand out and help his team every time he steps on the ice. I'm really happy we took him and I think there's very little seperation between him and our #2-5 prospects. Svechnikov would be in that tier if not for his production last year, and will have an easy time getting back into it if he bounces back.

Add Kotkansalo

 

[njx9]

Svech. Thoroughly unimpressed by Berggren. Add Setkov.

 

[RedWingsfan55]

Svechnikov again. I think there's way too much recency bias favoring Berggren and opposing Svechnikov. Berggren is the shiny new toy and he had a good development camp that everyone had the chance to see, which obviously makes people excited, but I don't think Svech just magically forgot how to play hockey; expecting a bounce back year for Evgeny.

Def this. Everyone likes the new shiny toy.

 

[Goalie guy]

Going with Berggren then Pope

 

[Rzombo4 prez]

Berggren again

 

[muchbetterthanlada]

voted Saarijarvi in the previous round.. pretty futile at this point, so I'll give my vote to Svech. I still like him.

 

[waltdetroit]

Svetch on hopes

Add Setkov

 

[TheMule93]

Close poll finally. I can see the argument for either. Svech had a really impressive rookie season but followed it up with what can be only described as a complete failure of a season. I guess this depends on how heavily you weigh svechs sophomore campaign.

 

[snailderby]

Add Regula.

 

[Martinez]

Berggren. Sorry svech, do better.
Add Regula

 

[Cyborg Yzerberg]

Went Berggren here, of all our forwards, I like his upside the most next to Zadina. I’m really curious what his +1 looks like.

 

[Fil Larkmanthanasiou]

Berggren add Fulcher

 

[Shaman464]

Svech, Berggren has never played on NA ice, so its jumping the gun to say a lot about him.

 

[Pavels Dog]

I like Berggren's potential but this should be Svech.

 

[RabidBadger]

The broken record says Berggren, add Setkov.