I think people are still underestimating Goligoski. He would fit on a lot of teams top 4 right now.
The converse to your position is that if Panik and Oesterle are "scraps," then why not get something back of value for them rather than let them walk for free at season's end? If they're "scraps," then what do they contribute to chemistry if they're kept for continuity?
Continuity is good for the core, not for the fringe. There's no way on earth you can convince me that Panik and Oesterle are part of our core going forward. Chayka needs to keep the core together to develop, I will concede the point. But those who are depth or fringe players who are certainly not coming back for the long term should net us assets. I'm not as down on non-first-round picks as you seem to be, but who's to say that Panik/Oesterle would go for picks? Maybe a team needing a good depth veteran for a playoff push might part with a decent prospect in exchange for Panik. It's not as if Tucson doesn't need depth (they only dressed 17 players last night).
I figure that the players on the team are professional to know that trades are made in an effort to improve the team, and they realize that even if they are playing well, there's no room for complacency. It's just as important to let your younger players in the system know that there is opportunity available for them as it is to maintain a positive equilibrium. Would you rather send a message to Richard Panik that he doesn't have to get movers until July, or tell Michael Bunting that now is the time to see if he's got the goods to stick at the top level?
Panik is a UFA, he will play hard no matter what
35+ point forward last 2 years that can PK, decent on D and on a forecheck. He is pretty consistent in all areas. You can't expect him to be a 50 point forward, thats all.I don't know which Panik you've been watching this season, but I certainly haven't seen evidence of this.
You don't want to move scraps? We have a lot of injuries so the team you see now will not be the team that starts next year, so the chemistry that you are talking about now with the current line up probably won't exist. There are four or five on the current roster that I would have no trouble trading. Even if we had no injuries we probably would be a bubble team. We are not good enough. Besides getting picks back we clear up contract room for our big signing in the off season.The next time we get into the playoffs, it will come right down to the end of the year. It could be this year, next, or the year after. I don't see the point of moving scraps that will return second round or later picks. How has that worked for us so far? If we had a high value player that wasn't going to sign here, then maybe we make a trade.
The team is playing pretty well lately, all things considered and has an outside shot at the playoffs. If we trae Goose/Panik/Grabner, it signals we are giving up on the season. That sends a message to the players that we don't believe this group can make it into the playoffs. "Trader John" has made enough moves and enough changes for me, then add in the injuries. To me, continuity an chemistry is more important for this team right now then trying to outsmart somebody or plan for 2-3 years from now by selling important role players for picks. For whatever reason, Tocc has this group looking solid, lets stick with it, get a few players back, an see what happens. So we don't get the 50th and 75th pick in next years draft for Panik or whoever, who cares, its a 5% chance of being a Panik/Osterle anyway. Stay the course.
I like Panik, but he is a UFA and he just might be valuable come TTD. We can then offer him a contract in the summer. The way it sounds, Dvo, Grabner and Richardson are close to returning so we will have more than enough to fill Panik's role.35+ point forward last 2 years that can PK, decent on D and on a forecheck. He is pretty consistent in all areas. You can't expect him to be a 50 point forward, thats all.
The converse to your position is that if Panik and Oesterle are "scraps," then why not get something back of value for them rather than let them walk for free at season's end? If they're "scraps," then what do they contribute to chemistry if they're kept for continuity?
Continuity is good for the core, not for the fringe. There's no way on earth you can convince me that Panik and Oesterle are part of our core going forward. Chayka needs to keep the core together to develop, I will concede the point. But those who are depth or fringe players who are certainly not coming back for the long term should net us assets. I'm not as down on non-first-round picks as you seem to be, but who's to say that Panik/Oesterle would go for picks? Maybe a team needing a good depth veteran for a playoff push might part with a decent prospect in exchange for Panik. It's not as if Tucson doesn't need depth (they only dressed 17 players last night).
I figure that the players on the team are professional to know that trades are made in an effort to improve the team, and they realize that even if they are playing well, there's no room for complacency. It's just as important to let your younger players in the system know that there is opportunity available for them as it is to maintain a positive equilibrium. Would you rather send a message to Richard Panik that he doesn't have to get movers until July, or tell Michael Bunting that now is the time to see if he's got the goods to stick at the top level?
We already traded Domi, Strome, Perlini, MacInnis, Duclair, Rieder, Martinook, Domingue, and some other pieces you could argue were a part of the young core at the time.
It will cost way more then that for Trouba. Think Chych+Fischer type of return. It will sting.Should be doing everything possible to try to pry away Trouba, but it might have to wait until the offseason. Seems like a foregone conclusion that he’s walking next year either way, so I have no idea what the ask would be but I can’t imagine they want to lose him for nothing. A lefty veteran puck mover with term left like Goligoski might interest them. I think everyone gives him a little too much crap, and think he could really help WPG in the playoffs. Wonder if Goligoski + Merkley + 3rd round pick would do it. No idea..but having the D be:
OEL-Hammer
Chychrun-Trouba
Oesterle/Capo-Demers
....would be top notch.
The chemistry exists now, thats what matters. Late picks wont' help us.You don't want to move scraps? We have a lot of injuries so the team you see now will not be the team that starts next year, so the chemistry that you are talking about now with the current line up probably won't exist. There are four or five on the current roster that I would have no trouble trading. Even if we had no injuries we probably would be a bubble team. We are not good enough. Besides getting picks back we clear up contract room for our big signing in the off season.
It will cost way more then that for Trouba. Think Chych+Fischer type of return. It will sting.
Not Chayka's guys though which I think is the key.
Connauton
As a Coyotes fan I am a big fan of getting Trouba to Arizona. He would be a fantastic add.Should be doing everything possible to try to pry away Trouba, but it might have to wait until the offseason. Seems like a foregone conclusion that he’s walking next year either way, so I have no idea what the ask would be but I can’t imagine they want to lose him for nothing. A lefty veteran puck mover with term left like Goligoski might interest them. I think everyone gives him a little too much crap, and think he could really help WPG in the playoffs. Wonder if Goligoski + Merkley + 3rd round pick would do it. No idea..but having the D be:
OEL-Hammer
Chychrun-Trouba
Oesterle/Capo-Demers
....would be top notch.
St. Louis won around 9 in a row , like Philly.You have said that all year, and that was before the injuries, yet here we are. The Coyotes may be pretenders but so was St. Louis and now they are in. Colorado was in, and now they are not. There are always upsets in the first round of playoffs, so they might be gone in a sweep, but they also may upset someone.
You may be right, but there will be a trade or two. It seems Chayka trades comes out of left field and surprises everyone.We don't trade anyone. We may be getting some healthy bodies back, so players like Kempe and Bunting get sent back down. Maybe Connauton or Weal gets dealt for a draft pick. But that is about all I could see taking place.
I agree about chemistry, but we had injuries and they still found chemistry. Grabner and Richardson come back have played together and have chemistry. Demers comes back and plays with OEL who had chemistry. You mean to tell you wouldn't trade a Weal or KConn or Panik for picks if those players returned from injury? Also, who said we trade for picks?The chemistry exists now, thats what matters. Late picks wont' help us.
St. Louis were talking about trading their best players a month ago, and now look at them. Colorado is doing just the opposite of St. Louis. I agree, we aren't built for the playoffs, but we could easily upset someone in the first round as it happens most years.St. Louis won around 9 in a row , like Philly.
AZ is hanging around, credit to them.
But they will fall short of the playoffs.
RT's done an amazing job.
AZ is not built for the playoffs. They would have ZERO chance.
AZ doesn't have zero chance of being in the playoffs or winning a round. It has happened so many times that a team gets hot, makes it in, and wins a round or goes further.St. Louis won around 9 in a row , like Philly.
AZ is hanging around, credit to them.
But they will fall short of the playoffs.
RT's done an amazing job.
AZ is not built for the playoffs. They would have ZERO chance.
We would get picks or an AHL player not likely to make our team in the next year, so throw ins. Panik contributes, Kconn/Weal are vet depth players, I would keep them just in case we make a run and keep our chemistry on an off the ice.I agree about chemistry, but we had injuries and they still found chemistry. Grabner and Richardson come back have played together and have chemistry. Demers comes back and plays with OEL who had chemistry. You mean to tell you wouldn't trade a Weal or KConn or Panik for picks if those players returned from injury? Also, who said we trade for picks?