Cucumber
The best
- Feb 7, 2014
- 2,089
- 67
Putting bias aside who was the better player in their respective careers?
Thought this would be an interesting debate.
Thought this would be an interesting debate.
Cantona seems obvious to me here.
I did, but frankly, Cantona had more impact. He was the first foreign player to really establish himself as the dominant player. He won it all in England with a bunch of kids around him.
Yes, it does IMO. He had the toughest route. And didn't have the Henrys and Vieiras around him.
Well, that's only because Jacquet thought nobody should could ZZ himself. Cantona was an excellent NT player until ZZ thought he'd rather have his own friends.
The second part is a legitimate argument. But being the first foreign player to establish himself doesn't mean much to me. Especially because he wasn't.
And he had Giggs, Bruce, Ince, Schmeichel, Hughes, Keane, etc around him. And yeah, they were kids, but they were some damn good kids
His comeback season after the ban alone wins him this argument. Few players have dominated a season as well as he when it came to winning games. Back then, EPL was still on free tv channels on Saturdays in Finland and I remember more than a few United games that tehywere having all sorts of issues until King Eric scored the winner.
I did, but frankly, Cantona had more impact. He was the first foreign player to really establish himself as the dominant player. He won it all in England with a bunch of kids around him.
Well France kind of sucked during Cantona's hey day. Failed to make the World Cup for example.
Not his fault... Houiller... They had a solid team.
Again, that's not Ginola who had champagne bottles openned at HALFTIME of the second to last game.And Ginola's fault too
Not his fault... Houiller... They had a solid team.
Tough one but Bergkamp for me because he had more impact on his NT than Cantona. And I think both had similar impact for their respective clubs. Also, Bergkamp is more likeable.