So, an NHL club had a choice between Richter and Beezer and they took Richter. They may or may not have been right, and the latter guy was a bit older, but I thought it was worth pointing out.
Also, showing their playoff records seems a bit misleading. I mean, Richter spent his career on a team with an endless budget always trying to "go for it" and Vanbiesbrouck spent his best seasons playing for an Expansion club and still backstopped them to the Cup final.
I'll take '96 Beezer's playoff performance over '94 Richter, even if the better final result goes to Richter - and I'm not taking anything away from what Richter did in New York that spring.
That's fine, and I'll take Richter at his best over Beezer. But both were good.
I'm just surprised so many are attached to Vanbiesbrouck. In sum we've got:
- Stanley Cup: Richter yes, Beezer no
- Canada/World Cup: Richter yes, Beezer no
- Vezina: Beezer yes, Richter no
Vanbiesbrouck had the longer career and had at least a few great seasons after age 30, which Richter didn't. Certainly I'd give Vanbiesbrouck the greater career value. But peak to peak in comparison, I would go with Richter. And "Vanbiesbrouck" is really hard to spell.