Now I feel like the guy who has just discovered the H in the Whalers logo.did you ever notice how it has the word 'beat' in it like the musical term
Draisaitl . Everyone thinks he a product of McDavid . Had one NYR fan argue he was a 40 point player with out McDavid . Hart winner last year while centring his own line. Averaging 1.5 ppg the last 2 years . A beast defensively but gets no credit for that side of his game .
He's one of the best player in the league, for sure. But there is literally nothing to support him being a "beast defensively". He's good at stripping the puck from his opponents but that's it.Draisaitl . Everyone thinks he a product of McDavid . Had one NYR fan argue he was a 40 point player with out McDavid . Hart winner last year while centring his own line. Averaging 1.5 ppg the last 2 years . A beast defensively but gets no credit for that side of his game .
The biggest issue with people's perception of Chycrun was that he fell quite a lot in draft rankings over the draft year, and even on draft day. To many, falling on draft day mean imminent bust, but that wasn't the case here. McKenzie had him ranked 2nd, behind Matthews, a year before the draft. By the final ranking, McKenzie had him at 13, Sportnset had him 12, and then he went and fell to 16. Lots of people took that to mean that he was a failing prospect I think.Chych never really stagnated. Dude had a great draft year and followed it up by making the NHL at 18 and needed a few years to develop. The problem was that he was WAY over scouted and dropped the last 4 months before the draft, for a few people on this site he was still seen as a top 5 pick on draft day. It was Chychrun or Dubois for me at 4th.
Ya that's what I mean. He was over scouted, people started picking apart his play on a micro level and applying that to the macro where that's what he was. In reality he's always been an absolute stud. Bob Mac's lists are always just a compilation of scouts opinions and while helpful and unique his list includes bias like that.The biggest issue with people's perception of Chycrun was that he fell quite a lot in draft rankings over the draft year, and even on draft day. To many, falling on draft day mean imminent bust, but that wasn't the case here. McKenzie had him ranked 2nd, behind Matthews, a year before the draft. By the final ranking, McKenzie had him at 13, Sportnset had him 12, and then he went and fell to 16. Lots of people took that to mean that he was a failing prospect I think.