Whiule I think Babcock is the correct answer, if you ask every fanbase in the NHL, there is some "scrub" they feel is being overplayed.Meh, I know haters think they're trolling leafs fans, but they're not. Babcock is overrated and overplays scrubs.
How can he be overrated when the only fans that know much about him almost universally shit on him when he chose to leave? And the rest of the fans were like "durr look at the 'Canes record"Bill Peters
Considering he is widely considered the best coach in the NHL, those numbers don't scream best coach in the NHL. That is why he is being mentioned. Babcock is easily a top 5 coach in the NHL (probably top 3), but he often gets talked about like he is far and away the best coach in the NHL. This is why he is being mentioned as overrated. Overrated doesn't mean not good.3rd highest pts% of all current NHL head coaches
4th most games coached and wins of all current NHL head coaches
#1PP since 2016-2017 season
#9PK since 2016-2017 season
7th place leaguewide last year
But yeah okay overrated
You try to win an Olympic medal coaching 2o plus players that have not really played together all that much. Could you do that?
#1PP since 2016-2017 season
#9PK since 2016-2017 season
7th place leaguewide last year
They’ve been waiting for someone to do that for 5 years alreadyTaking over a team that has been tanking for over a decade must be really challenging.
The guy who "leads" the Sabres to 7th place in 3 or 4 years must be a real genius then.
Babcock is a good coach. But for those that believe he is a great all around coach need to know his defensive coaching is overrated.
He basically coaches a run and gun system. As in this year's Leafs team.
His teams score alot, and get scored on a lot. It is obvious without a Hall of Fame D man like Lidstrom. Babcock defensive deficiencies are exposed. To a degree Andersen has been able to cover up.
Babcock's trading chances system has won only 1 cup in 15 years of coaching.
Babcock has built a career on interference and getting away with it. But also, it needs to be pointed out. His defensive coaching is not as good as one would believe from a coach of his caliber. His coaching does lead players to career offensive years as we have seen in Kadri. His run and gun systems do benefit his players stats.A run and gun system since he has the tools in Toronto, but the essence of his system is built on interference and stick work going back to his time in Detroit. The officials won't call everything.
This statement cannot be true at this point in time.Babcock has won a lot of games. I think hes gone the playoffs multiple seasons in a row. Hes not the best coach in the league but hes not overrated.
Taking over a team that has been tanking for over a decade must be really challenging.
The guy who "leads" the Sabres to 7th place in 3 or 4 years must be a real genius then.
Liking just for your burial of Loser Todd, but don't agree on Lemaire. Hitchcock was okay at one time. He's a dinosaur now.Mclellan before the Oilers hired him and exposed him for the fraud he is.
Hitchcock was massively overrated if we are going back actually high rated coaches. Lets throw in Lemaire in the mix to make a complete **** sandwich.
I get the impression that things are measured simply in accomplishments; i.e. the winning coach being better than the losing one, the championship coach being better than the runner-up, etc. While in absolute terms, if a victory is the sole measure of coaching skill, this can be correct, it's not the sole measure of skill in coaching. Sometimes even a losing coach does a hell of a job.On hfboards there are no good coaches only morons who make terrible decisions and have asterisks beside all of their accomplishments because everything is easy due to x, y and z.
All coaches are idiots, especially my team.