Player Discussion Who had the better world junior tourney

[jaffy27]

Voted for Roy, Mysak was always supposed to be dominant, he's over 20...if you voted for Mysak, you just didn't factor in the age...

But that wasn’t the question….

It’s simply who had the better WJC

When they vote for the Norris, they don’t factor in age, it’s just who was the best defensemen.

Who was most impressive player may be Roy, the word impressive is exactly that, who impressed you the most.

It’s how I see it

 

[Scintillating10]

I thought Mysak was slight edge over Roy. But he is year older also

 

[bopeep]

But that wasn’t the question….

It’s simply who had the better WJC

When they vote for the Norris, they don’t factor in age, it’s just who was the best defensemen.

Who was most impressive player may be Roy, the word impressive is exactly that, who impressed you the most.

It’s how I see it

Everything seems to be about semantics during these dog days of summer... If it's not about who had the "best" tournament vs. the most "impressive" or dominant, it 's arguing at length about the definition of "consensus"...

Let's just play some frickin' hockey already and it'll keep these discussions about the subtleties of the English language to a minimum

 

[SOLR]

But that wasn’t the question….

It’s simply who had the better WJC

When they vote for the Norris, they don’t factor in age, it’s just who was the best defensemen.

Who was most impressive player may be Roy, the word impressive is exactly that, who impressed you the most.

It’s how I see it

Who had the best WJC vs. where they should be - is always at the core of having "the better WJC" in a development situation.

The Norris is for a bunch of adults, they have arrived, and it's the top competition, no need to put an asterisk on it.

 

[Habs10Habs]

I went with Mysak, but Roy was quite impressive.

 

[SOLR]

Everything seems to be about semantics during these dog days of summer... If it's not about who had the "best" tournament vs. the most "impressive" or dominant, it 's arguing at length about the definition of "consensus"...

Let's just play some frickin' hockey already and it'll keep these discussions about the subtleties of the English language to a minimum

Semantics is at the core of survey design - this is not a summer thing.

As soon as we introduce the word "better", the question "better than what" becomes highly relevant and of multiple correct angles.

 

[Legend123]

I just wish Roy was a great skater

 

[Mrb1p]

Roy and Mysak are really close. Roy had more support but a lesser role and is younger.

Id say relatively Roy, but Mysak as a whole.

 

[L4br3cqu3]

My answer to the question of the poll is Mysak, he was the best scorer and leader of a -very- average team.

My answer to who has the most potential, it's Roy, but that's not the question of this poll.