Who gets the hook?

Durkin67

Guest
Lets have a little fun...

Suppose the league added Vegas next year. Suppose they also informed each club that they had to tender not a PROTECTED, but an UNPROTECTED list of players, lets say 5 per team.

What are the top two roster players on your club whom you feel the respective clubs would expose?

Lets see what this hypothetical Vegas team might look like...

Name your team, then your picks.

Rules: Anyone who is a UFA in the off season ineligible. Anyone with a pro contract is eligible.

This should be interesting.
 

Mattavarner

Registered User
Apr 17, 2014
1,595
1,198
Lets have a little fun...

Suppose the league added Vegas next year. Suppose they also informed each club that they had to tender not a PROTECTED, but an UNPROTECTED list of players, lets say 5 per team.

What are the top two roster players on your club whom you feel the respective clubs would expose?

Lets see what this hypothetical Vegas team might look like...

Name your team, then your picks.

Rules: Anyone who is a UFA in the off season ineligible. Anyone with a pro contract is eligible.

This should be interesting.

Leafs would guaranteed put Clarkson, and maybe Robidas
 

NSH615

...
Feb 13, 2013
11,119
981
Because Pending UFA's are ineligible,

Nashville: Top 2: Stalberg and Nystrom

For top 5, I would add Hutton, Clune and Bartley
 

Durkin67

Guest
You'd put Lupul instead of Ashton and even Winnik or Booth?

Absolutely.

two reasons:

1. Cap hit VS production
2. The emergence of younger high end talent

Essentially, its a free buyout opportunity. Lupul has yet to play a full season. Ashton costs ypou nothing. Winnick is the kind of player the Leafs have been after for years. He's a fantastic utility piece. He needs to be re-signed. Booth is on a 1 year deal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad