26Mats
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2018
- 32,427
- 24,914
Indeed, this year was the right one to take a defenseman...
We'll see in the end...
Indeed, this year was the right one to take a defenseman...
Martin St-Louis and Lecavalier both played against Iggy. I’m sure these two guys will want himHot trending prospect and one of the youngest in the draft. I think this is a big factor. If there was no trade (incentive to move down) and Demidov was gone, Iggy is my pick.
No offense to Lindstrom or Catton but I really like Iggy's progress. Solid height/weight for one of the youngest in the draft. Should max out around 6'-1" and 200 lbs. Good skater, good goal scoring ability, good energy, plays a solid north/south game.
Agree but 5th is too early for him imo. Maybe if they trade back
Martin St-Louis and Lecavalier both played against Iggy. I’m sure these two guys will want him
Why can't I select Zeev Buium?
I still wouldn't take him. His boneheaded antics have moved from off-ice to on-ice situations.Do you think we might see the NHL have an emotional overreaction to Connelly's boneheaded 5 minute major, and he could fall all the way to the Winnipeg pick?
I still wouldn't take him. His boneheaded antics have moved from off-ice to on-ice situations.
Chance to get Demidov
If I'm Chicago I'm picking a D all day long. They take longer to develop and they need to set up the cornerstones of their future top 4. They'll still be horrible next year and there are several stud forwards in the 2025 draft by the looks of it.
Hey at least you didn't have to be nervous about your guy getting picked from 2-4 only to have them pass on your guy.
Or maybe it's just that rush offense is most tailor made for highlights? He's great in the offensive zone too lmao
We are definitely going to miss out on him.
Lindstrom has the better shot, but other than that and being more filled out (bad thing?), why do you prefer Lindstrom over Sennecke? Their skating is close, though I prefer Sennecke, but what sets Sennecke apart is his hands and vision. It’s just on another level compared to Lindstrom who’s got hands of stone and blinders on while Sennecke has some of the best mitts and offensive vision in the draft. To me it’s just what gives Sennecke much more upside. Lindstrom is big, mean and can really rip pucks, but Sennecke is just a much more well rounded offensive package in a physical 6’3” frame himself.
I've been saying this. The rumbling last year was that this year draft would be D heavy. And it is.
Early predictions of next year draft looks full of forwards in the top half.
This is the year to draft your top franchise Defenseman and next year you get your Forward.
Well, Chicago fans seem to want Demidov and not a D. Think that forward is far more of a priority.
Demidov would be their new Panarin.
Whichever D are picked, I'm just saying Lindtrom and Demidov will be gone before 5.
If the Habs pass on Sennecke, how far could he fall? Could the habs trade up to get him in addition to someone else at 5?
Do you think we might see the NHL have an emotional overreaction to Connelly's boneheaded 5 minute major, and he could fall all the way to the Winnipeg pick?
BPA is one way to go.Someone earlier on this thread said we don't have 3 Nicklas Lidstrom and I got a good chuckle.
Seriously, I don't know what Guhle/Hutson/Xhekaj have done for us to not even consider Buium/Dickinson if Demidov and Lindstrom are gone at 5.
Nope, id want more. Id target a team with 2 1st rounders and see if they would trade both for the #5 Lets see how bad Calgary wants baby IggyI'm warming up to Helenius. I do think we trade to 8-10 range but that will depend on the incentive. Would hurt if we trade down, miss on Iggy and he becomes just as good or better than his father and we end up taking a bust.
What is the expectation to get from trading 5 to 8-10? A early 2nd rounder? Not sure that is worth it guys.
Yeah, he's my pick today. I really like the hot trend combined with his early age. Just take Iggy and call it a day.
Work at moving the late 1st and early 2nd for our top 6F search. Dach/Newhook type move.
Not far. Sennecke had a vote at 5 and 7 on Bob's survey rankings. Another one at 10. Very low chance he's taken outside the top 10 at this point.If the Habs pass on Sennecke, how far could he fall? Could the habs trade up to get him in addition to someone else at 5?
If we trade back from 5 to 8/9/10 I’d want that piece to be able to be packaged to get back into top 20 for someone droppingYes but we also need to make it worth our while to give up 5 for 8/9/10. Teams have to give us a great piece to make that jump
if we could get 9 & 14 I do that in a heartbeat unless somehow Demidov dropped to 5I would trade fifth if we are guaranteed two picks in top 15. And that means a three way trade from the get go. The logical target is SJ second first.
Mtl 5th to Calgary
Cgy 9th + Vancouver 1st to Montreal
Vancouver + Winnipeg first for SJ second first (14th overall)
But I wouldnt make this trade unless its locked in from the get go. I would not trade down and then wait to see if we can acquire the SJ pick.
However I prefer the idea of drafting best D available and trying to acquire Zegras with remaining draft capital and add ons.
Sarcasm?Good...goooood...we want this thought out in the universe.
If I were Chicago management, I would go BPA, and not draft for need.Well, Chicago fans seem to want Demidov and not a D. Think that forward is far more of a priority.
Demidov would be their new Panarin.
Seider was the same…..posters need to understand that teams go off THEIR scouts, not Bob’s.Makar himself was ranked close to 15th overall on several lists in his draft year. Colorado picking him at 4 was a considered a reach at the time.
You’re assuming Habs have Buium higher on their list then Demidov or Lindstrom?Pick BPA with both picks.
Don't pass on Buium because we have Matheson and Huston.
Makar was hard to rank, he played in a relatively obscure league, the AJHL.