Over the last 2 seasons the top 5 scorers areIt's not unrealistic for Malkin to outscore Mcdavid. Let's not pretend Mcdavid has won those two rosses by a landslide.
Over the last 2 seasons the top 5 scorers are
1. McDavid 208
2. Kucherov 185
3. Crosby 178
4. Malkin/Marchand 170
Giroux getting hot doesn't help someone else win the next year.
Right, id take Crosby over anyone in the playoffs. But that's not what the topic is.And Crosby outscored him by 13 in the playoffs
Yes. There isn't enough talk about Patr. Ka. For some reason he gets overlooked these days.If the Hawks PP weren't 12% Kane would be ahead by now.
Lol McDavid was sick for about a month last year and still left the competition in the dust by years end. PPG doesn’t mean anything at the end of the year.He has finished .03 and .01 ahead of the 2nd best in PPG each year. Assuming everyone else is healthy, 75 games for McDavid is likely not winning the Art Ross.
89 in 75 games is a 97 point pace in 16-17. So relax there
Wtf, is that actually true?!lol. The PP for Edmonton has been run in atrocious fashion. Five left handed shots on PP1 and five Right handed shots on PP2.
McDavid is doing it with little help and will continue to do so.
I feel like 16-17 Crosby was betterThe main difference between Crosby in 17 and Crosby in 14 is prime Kunitz.
It's not unrealistic for Malkin to outscore Mcdavid. Let's not pretend Mcdavid has won those two rosses by a landslide.
Pointless trophy.
Conn Smythe is the only individual award that matters.
Pretty self explanatory?Explanation?
Pretty self explanatory?
Winning the Cup is all that matters. The rest is all fluff
not true. Winning the cup is out of the hands of one player himself.Pretty self explanatory?
Winning the Cup is all that matters. The rest is all fluff
I'm not (right now, at least). I just don't really care about comparing players, I find comparing teams more productiveOkay but winning the cup isn’t something that 1 person did all alone. You can’t use cups to compare players that’s ridiculous
I'm not (right now, at least). I just don't really care about comparing players, I find comparing teams more productive
Yup, fair enough. I used to care more about the Art Ross race, Hart trophy, etc. I guess over the years I've just been jaded by good players on good teams with no cups. So that's all that really interests me now.Yes depending on terms. Fair enough though but I’ll respectfully disagree. This time last year Ovi didn’t have a cup but he had his own trophies and awards to prove himself individually. I feel like you do need these awards especially for players that are/were in his scenario.
Just my 2 cents
That's all fine and well but Evgeni Malkin is one of the players who can steal a Ross from Mcdavid. Only two players in history were guaranteed to win the scoring title.No one is pretending anything. However someone is pretending that a guy who just won 2 consecutive Art Ross Trophies by age 21 is not the clear cut favourite to win the Art Ross in a landslide as he enters his prime years lol.
McDavid is the 2nd player in hockey history to have done this.
and your talking about landslide .. cmon man
Malkin
McDavid
MacKinnon
Kucherov
Kane
Crosby
Marchand
all have a chance.
Still put my money on McDavid but Malkin is my number 2.
I see many include Rantanen but I see almost no chance for him. I know he's currently in the lead but he's been very lucky and there is no way he keeps it up and all of the players I listed above are better than him.
Mcdavid is looking like he might make that a trio. Not that he is anywhere close to those two but there are no generational talents in his age group to compete with. If Crosby Ovechkin and malkin were all 21-25 again it would be a different story.That's all fine and well but Evgeni Malkin is one of the players who can steal a Ross from Mcdavid. Only two players in history were guaranteed to win the scoring title.
I did not say he has no talent. You're reading stuff in between the lines that doesn't exist. I said his current production is inflated because of luck (he should finish with 80-ish points, hardly enough for the Art Ross) - see his oiSH% Mikko Rantanen Stats | Hockey-Reference.comYou Sir are absolutely correct. He has no talent whatsoever. It’s all pure luck. Some would even say he’s the luckiest player in all of sports. I saw a game once where he accidentally passed the puck to MacKinnon twice then he scored one himself, also by accident. I remember thinking to myself, omg this guy is lucky...
Either way, I don’t see anyone but McDavid winning it. He’s just too dominant once he gets going.