sr edler
gold is not reality
- Mar 20, 2010
- 11,907
- 6,346
Do you think it would be impossible to find similar examples within the history forum's top 100 list?
This standard you are asserting - is it going to survive contact with reality?
I'm still curious about this concept of rating players by their lowest lows, as opposed to their highest highs. It seems people use one standard for the players they dislike and the other standard for the players they prefer.
What players do I prefer? Give some examples of this so I know what you're talking about, and then we can take it from there.
Stamkos was generally fairly underwhelming and didn't drive the overall bus in Tampa come playoff time. He was outshone by Martin St. Louis early on, and Lecavalier, then by Tyler Johnson, then by all sorts of players including Palat, Kucherov, Hedman, and Point, and their goalie.
I don't speak for the history forum's lists, I think I've done 2 or 3 of those over 15 years here. If you have a beef with these people I can't help you MJ, sorry.