Dion TheFluff
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2015
- 3,890
- 3,338
top 10 quite easily to me. Dont really see any argument for having Quinn over him and Quinn is likely a top 10 pick.
I will revisit this if he gets in the playon and causes some effect,strong effect on our game like i think he will. I think he is being underrated strongly so far thank you
I think he would be right in the conversation after Lafrenier. Assuming you are drafting BPA. Now thats not saying a team wouldn’t take a defenseman they view equally. I think he would have to be in the conversation right after the first pick.Where do you think he would of gone, since you started the thread.
It's strong in the 11-20 range compared to most classes. Although, historically, the difference between very outlying drafts (2003 and 2015), the difference among picks outside the top 10 is rarely significant. You will see gems found all over the draft, sometimes its the 11th pick (Kopitar), other times it is Gaudreau in the 4th. The top end of this draft is good, not great. If it was truly strong at the very top, Lafreniere would have been challenged much harder. He's behind guys like McDavid, and the tier behind McDavid which is Matthews, Eichel, MacKinnon, Dahlin and to a lesser extent Jones (who was viewed as MacKinnon's equal but slipped to 4 somehow) of drafts since 2011. Then you have to sort out where you place him among that next tier of Laine, Hughes, Kakko, Svechnikov, and RNH.I keep hearing that this is a strong draft. I've.certainly heard that before, but is it true?
The Luke Schenn draft was considered a strong draft. Did Nail Yakupov get drafted in a strong draft?
Is a strong draft the one where the number 1 could be any of 5 players?
And why would that be?Probably top-15, doubtful anybody would use a top-10 pick on him.
And why would that be?
Easily a consideration at 5 and earlier. I said before teams will draft by position like someone will do on Askarov but he would be in conversation earlyTop 5.
Two players had a points per game higher than him in that list. None out scored him we know that. I think he gets consideration earlier
- Lafreniere
- Byfield
- Stutzle
- Lundell
- Raymond
- Drysdale
- Holtz
- Askarov
- Perfetti
- Rossi
- Robertson
- Sanderson
- Gunler
- Jarvis
- Zary
Wherever you have Jack Quinn ranked, put him right above him for sure.
Robertson is 8 days older, 55 goals, 86 points in 46 games on a much weaker overall team. He's 5'9", 161 lbs.
Quinn had had 52 goals, 89 points in 62 games on the OHL's and arguably the CHL's, best team (including Marco Rossi, who had the most points in the CHL). 5'11", 176.
Robertson would be in the mix with Quinn, Dawson Mercer, Dylan Holloway and Seth Jarvis this year. That almost certainly puts him in the top 15, because he could be above all 4 of them, but I don't think he is quite top 10. He could even challenge Lundell, Askarov and Sanderson in terms of skill and upside, but those guys have some positional and size value, so I am not sure I would have him in the top 10 over two of them.
So I would put him in the 9-15 range, and there are some pretty nice players in that range. The top 8 is very nice, 9-15 is probably above average, 16-40ish is about average (good prospects but nothing I would say that is significantly better than a normal draft), after that there are a bunch (possibly as much as 50) good 3rd round prospects, which means that 41-62 is below average, but pretty nice if you have picks in the 3rd round.
Absolutely. Thats why we got him where we did ehLikely his size hurts his draft positioning, 5’9” and 164 lbs
Seeing as age isnt a huge factor, is there a reason why you have Robertson and Quinn so close though?
You seem to be pointing to the fact Robertson also has an advantage due the fact he was on a weaker team, correct?
I, again, stress I havnt paid much attention to this years prospects but does not Robertson have, not only better offensive numbers but insanely better numbers?
Goals per game:
Robertson: 1.2
Quinn: .84
Points per game:
Robertson: 1.86
Quinn: 1.43
Quinn is a bit bigger but besides that, what keeps him even close to Robertson here? Skating, defensive awareness, grit? Offensively, its not even close really and it doesnt seem like anyone in the draft was remotely close to Robertsons goal scoring ability.
Some stats from an article that dont even have to do with draft year:
"In the past 38 years, only three Canadian Junior players under 19 years old have been able to match Robertson’s mark of 1.20 goals/game: Eric Lindros (OHL, 1990-91), Mario Lemieux (QMJHL, 1983-84) and Joe Sakic (WHL, 1987-88)."
"Over the past twenty years, only two OHL players under 19 have posted a scoring rate above 1.00 goals/game: John Tavares (1.08 goals/game) and Patrick Kane (1.07 goals/game)."
Just want to know what Im missing.
Not trying to be one of those guys that overrates our prospects either here. Those numbers are just mind boggling though and hes being talked among even neutral NHL writers as a guy who has a real chance to make an impact in the NHL now due to his goal scoring ability and this is a player who was incredibly close to being eligible for this years draft. Outside of Lafreniere, no one would even think of any other prospects this year having that sort of chance.
It would have to be a crazy strong draft to keep a guy with those numbers in the 9-15 range no? Is it his ceiling? Is it attitude? Should we not be more excited?
if 5'9 180 pound Brad Marchand can be 4th in the league in points per game after McDavid, MacKinnon, and Kucherov over the last 3 years then there's no reason it should hold Robertson back. I'm not saying Robertson will be that good, but if he's not it won't be because of his sizeLikely his size hurts his draft positioning, 5’9” and 164 lbs