GlitchMarner
Typical malevolent, devious & vile Maple Leafs fan
So I'm watching a bit of Smackdown, which is a rarity for me nowadays, and I hear all this talk that Cena is possibly the greatest of all-time in the WWE, prior to his return.
That can't be right, can it?
He's a guy who has very good if not great longevity as a huge star and attraction, but at the height of his popularity I don't think he was ever as big as Hogan in the 80s or Austin in the late 90s. He's never been a great technician like Flair (whose legacy is largely based on his work outside of the WWE) or Bret Hart or as entertaining in the ring as Michaels. He's never had the mystique/presence of The Undertaker.
I think of him as being more like HHH: A more divisive sort of star who has gotten his share of criticism and praise and has been a serviceable main eventer for years. At least in hockey some people try to use the argument that "the sport is a lot better now than it used to be." I don't think it justifies calling Crosby better than guys like Gretzky and Lemieux, but at least there's some substance to the notion of improvement in hockey. To me it's not like wrestling now is better than it was in the 80s or 90s. I do think match quality is better than it was during the Attitude Era, but Cena has never been the most talented wrestler anyway; I just don't see any argument that he's the GOAT. I'm sure that's not a popular notion among internet smarks especially.
That can't be right, can it?
He's a guy who has very good if not great longevity as a huge star and attraction, but at the height of his popularity I don't think he was ever as big as Hogan in the 80s or Austin in the late 90s. He's never been a great technician like Flair (whose legacy is largely based on his work outside of the WWE) or Bret Hart or as entertaining in the ring as Michaels. He's never had the mystique/presence of The Undertaker.
I think of him as being more like HHH: A more divisive sort of star who has gotten his share of criticism and praise and has been a serviceable main eventer for years. At least in hockey some people try to use the argument that "the sport is a lot better now than it used to be." I don't think it justifies calling Crosby better than guys like Gretzky and Lemieux, but at least there's some substance to the notion of improvement in hockey. To me it's not like wrestling now is better than it was in the 80s or 90s. I do think match quality is better than it was during the Attitude Era, but Cena has never been the most talented wrestler anyway; I just don't see any argument that he's the GOAT. I'm sure that's not a popular notion among internet smarks especially.