JimmyH
Registered User
- May 19, 2018
- 177
- 234
Because it seems to me that by "sticking up" for teammates after they find themselves on the receiving end of a big (but legal) hit, the players are complicit in the ongoing shift in the way the game is officiated and sanitized. The players are protesting clean hits by stopping play (ultimately), and the league probably feels inclined to take some proactive stance on this. Moreover, as a strategy to prevent fighting and illegal hits, the NHL levies fines and suspensions for such behavior and we see what, in my opinion, is a softer game being played. I say that because I think the line between a hard hit and an illegal hit has become blurred recently, and is continuing in the direction of simply equating the two when it looks bad to the naked eye.
So, my questions to you guys:
1. Are the tough guys who immediately look for a fight after their teammate absorbs a big hit actually partially responsible for the game going soft?
2. Is it going soft? Am I correct?
If I am correct, it's a case of unfortunate irony for the fans who like a rough-and-tough style of play.
So, my questions to you guys:
1. Are the tough guys who immediately look for a fight after their teammate absorbs a big hit actually partially responsible for the game going soft?
2. Is it going soft? Am I correct?
If I am correct, it's a case of unfortunate irony for the fans who like a rough-and-tough style of play.