Dion Phaneuf - 6'2 200lbs 16 yrs old - 66gp, 5g + 12a = 17pts, +21, 170pims 17 yrs old - 71gp, 16g + 14a = 30pts, +28, 185pims 18 yrs old - 62gp, 19g + 24a = 43pts, +11, 126pims 19 yrs old - 17gp, 11g + 8a = 19pts, +5, 25pims Cam Barker - 6'3 200lbs 16 yrs old - 64gp, 10g + 37a = 47pts, -16, 79pims 17 yrs old - 69gp, 21g + 44a = 65pts, +17, 105pims 18 yrs old - 22gp, 5g + 20a = 25pts, +11, 46pims So what's the big difference between these two blue chip prospects? Look at Barker's number's early on and they are much better than Phaneuf's. Both have played on very good teams in their early years, perhaps Barker's team at 16 wasn't very good, but he still put up some fine numbers. Is Barker better offensively than Phaneuf, even though Phaneuf scored 19 times last year and would probably put up 30 goals this year as a D-man if not for the WJC. I think everyone would agree that Phaneuf is the more physical D-man between the two? So in the end, who will be better?