What you're looking for doesn't exist this season. These are the top preforming goalies in the league this season and none of them are any different than Varlamov.
Varlamov: 5 games with 4+ goals and 7 sub.890% games.
Halak : 5 games with 4+ goals and 7 sub.890% games.
Gibson: 5 games with 4+ goals and 7 sub.890% games.
Vasilevskiy: 4 games with 4+ goals and 5 sub.890% games.
Rinne: 2 games with 4+ goals and 8 sub.890% games.
Bishop: 3 games with 4+ goals and 8 sub.890% games.
Andersen: 6 games with 4+ goals and 5 sub.890% games.
Rittich: 2 games with 4+ goals and 6 sub.890% games.
Thank you for pointing this out. There is a constant double standard when it comes to the consistency of Varly vs his backups or other starters. Every year the Varly haters say he should be traded because the backup is more consistent. They said it about Jiggy, Pickard, Bernier, and now Grubauer until they were given a starters workload and proved to be even more inconsistent.
Three of the best goalies in the world Hart, Quick, and Lundqvist have all had struggling seasons. People have this misconception that goalies are supposed to be great for 82 games every season. It's a very difficult position to play, especially when you've had the kind of awful defensive cores Varly has had in Colorado. Even with good defensive cores, the goalie is going to be off his game for certain stretches within a season.
Varly played great in the first half of the season. He stumbled a bit for 4-5 games recently but it wasn't just on him, the team was terrible defensively. He came back and had a real good game against Chicago. If he stumbles more down the stretch, he deserves heat for it and probably shouldn't be brought back when you factor in the injury risk.
If he plays well down the stretch though, he will have put in a very similar season to last year, and will have been just as consistent as most goaltender's seasons the last couple years.