Speculation: What would it take for the Bruins to trade for AND sign Artemi Panarin?

BruinDust · Jan 30, 2019

TCB said:
Sounds as if Kekalainen would be willing to take futures and not necessarily a roster player would be needed if the right deal is out there.

88 million over 7 years.

12.5 million AAV for Artemi Panarin?

Kucherov's cap hit is only slated to be 9.5 starting next season. And Panarin is no Kucherov.

Any GM who gives him that is out of his mind. You can be darn sure it won't be the Bruins, heck they wouldn't even come close. Nor should they.

TCB · Jan 30, 2019

BruinDust said:
88 million over 7 years.

12.5 million AAV for Artemi Panarin?

Kucherov's cap hit is only slated to be 9.5 starting next season. And Panarin is no Kucherov.

Any GM who gives him that is out of his mind. You can be darn sure it won't be the Bruins, heck they wouldn't even come close. Nor should they.

Ya, if that's the cost no thanks.

BruinDust · Jan 30, 2019

TCB said:
Ya, if that's the cost no thanks.

Dreger also speculated it may be the Tavares contract (11 million AAV). I wouldn't go there either for Panarin.

neelynugs · Jan 30, 2019

i'd be down with panarin as a rental, if the brass wants to go all-in on this year. assume that's a 1st round pick +
very good prospect + good prospect. can you get him for 1st/cehlarik/JFK? that's more like 2 good prospects.
a heavy price for a rental, but usually star players aren't available as rentals.

pkunit · Jan 30, 2019

JRull86 said:
Starts with DeBrusk and a 1st, and build from there.

I do it for a signed Panarin and around Bergeron money 6-7 years

Gee Wally · Jan 30, 2019

pkunit said:
I do it for a signed Panarin and around Bergeron money 6-7 years

You aint even in the ballpark. On either count.

Fenway · Jan 30, 2019

RoccoF14 said:
Why are we assuming Columbus would want to deal him at all? They are fighting for a playoff spot just like we are and we basically have the same record. Any offer for their franchise player, in the middle of a playoff push, would have to be a ridiculous over payment to even get the conversation started.

No thanks. Moving on.....

Sign him over the summer, and keep your assets for another trade if you are dead set on getting him.

CBJ might indeed decide to go for it all - and they will have plenty of cap room next year if he leaves.

WhalerTurnedBruin55 · Jan 30, 2019

neelynugs said:
i'd be down with panarin as a rental, if the brass wants to go all-in on this year. assume that's a 1st round pick +
very good prospect + good prospect. can you get him for 1st/cehlarik/JFK? that's more like 2 good prospects.
a heavy price for a rental, but usually star players aren't available as rentals.

Call me a pessimist but I don't think this team is good enough, even with Panarin. A team that's going for the wild card or #3 in the division shouldn't be going all in. Just my opinion.

pkunit · Jan 30, 2019

Gee Wally said:
You aint even in the ballpark. On either count.

After Panarin for McAvoy.Go Nylander For Carlo! Look out

trenton1 · Jan 30, 2019

I'd rather acquire 2 middle six players including one with some term.

Salem13 · Jan 30, 2019

What would it take for the Bruins to trade for AND sign Artemi Panarin?

My cold dead body!

HuskyBruinPride · Jan 30, 2019

He's a great player and would be a huge pickup but I just don't see the fit. Might not even be intersted in signing here long-term, very doubtful he would just ink an extension right away if we moved for him. Salary would need to go the other way to afford him. Backes wood be ideal but nobody is gonna wanna take on that contract. So that means you'll need to move one of McAvoy, Krug, Carlo, etc.

AngryMilkcrates · Jan 30, 2019

Salem13 said:
What would it take for the Bruins to trade for AND sign Artemi Panarin?

My cold dead body!

I think Columbus would want a high 1st rounder with that.

bruinmann77 · Jan 30, 2019

Bruins again are to far off to be moving a 1st rounder for a rental.

mflo77 · Jan 30, 2019

HuskyBruinPride said:
He's a great player and would be a huge pickup but I just don't see the fit. Might not even be intersted in signing here long-term, very doubtful he would just ink an extension right away if we moved for him. Salary would need to go the other way to afford him. Backes wood be ideal but nobody is gonna wanna take on that contract. So that means you'll need to move one of McAvoy, Krug, Carlo, etc.

you dont see the fit? this is a match made in rental heaven!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mflo77 · Jan 30, 2019

bruinmann77 said:
Bruins again are to far off to be moving a 1st rounder for a rental.

also close to bergeron turning 35, and krejci turning 34. the time is now. trade next years first next year as well if it means adding a player of panarin talent as a rental. we are destined for a retool in few years regardless.

OV · Jan 30, 2019

AngryMilkcrates said:
I think Columbus would want a high 1st rounder with that.

And a pine box ......for um.....a hockey stick case.

HuskyBruinPride · Jan 30, 2019

mflo77 said:
you dont see the fit? this is a match made in rental heaven!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not a fit for the reasons mentioned in the post. Did you even read what I said?

McGarnagle · Jan 30, 2019

Salem13 said:
What would it take for the Bruins to trade for AND sign Artemi Panarin?

My cold dead body!

In fairness, a cold dead body would provide more value to the 2019 Blue Jackets than Riley Nash has.

The don godfather · Jan 31, 2019

Can we just continue our draft and develop program . This is absolutely ridiculous the names I'm hearing getting shipped out debrusk Carlo mcavoy . It's not about just this year but the next 2 to 3years. If we don't get cup this year bergy marchand and David k are still young enough for another a run next year . These players are franchise type. Gotta be careful.

Jean_Jacket41 · Jan 31, 2019

BruinDust said:
88 million over 7 years.

12.5 million AAV for Artemi Panarin?

Kucherov's cap hit is only slated to be 9.5 starting next season. And Panarin is no Kucherov.

Any GM who gives him that is out of his mind. You can be darn sure it won't be the Bruins, heck they wouldn't even come close. Nor should they.

Kucherov gave TB a slight discount.

Panarin will no doubt get 10+ as a UFA.

wintersej · Jan 31, 2019

b in vancouver said:
You're borrowing headaches.

Backes might cost a small piece to move but could be done.
Krug could easily be moved.
Chara may retire.
K. Miller could be moved.
John Moore could be moved.
Halak could be moved.
Heinen, Donato, Cehlarik, JFK, etc. haven't done anything yet to worry about how much they're going to demand and all are moveable.

McAvoy and Carlo will be due decent contracts but neither should break the bank this summer. $10M for the two combined?

Not saying I'd be jumping for joy if they traded a bunch for him and gave him $10M+ a season ... but they could fit him into the line-up without that much fuss.

I would jump for joy.

Marchand/Bergeron
Panarin/Pasta

That’s a HELL of a couple pairs on a very stacked defensive team.

wintersej · Jan 31, 2019

BruinDust said:
Dreger also speculated it may be the Tavares contract (11 million AAV). I wouldn't go there either for Panarin.

I would. You would rather spend the saved money from 63/37/88 on more pluggers?

Greek_physique · Jan 31, 2019

Makes u wonder...why not just make a trade for Tarasenko instead, if avail.

Better cap hit

Pia8988 · Jan 31, 2019

Greek_physique said:
Makes u wonder...why not just make a trade for Tarasenko instead, if avail.

Better cap hit

Availability

Speculation: What would it take for the Bruins to trade for AND sign Artemi Panarin?

Registered User

Registered User

Registered User

Registered User

Registered User

Old, Grumpy Moderator

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian

Fading out, thanks for the times.

Registered User

Bergeron for Hart

Registered User

Registered User

End of an Era

Registered User

Registered User

Registered User

Obstructed View

Registered User

Yes.

Registered User

Neely = HOF

HFBoards Sponsor

HFBoards Sponsor

Caron - Legit SNIPER

Registered User

Ad

Ad

Ad