allsilverdreams
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2011
- 973
- 284
I think this would be the best way to rid us of his contract. What would it cost us from Seattle's point of view?
I think this would be the best way to rid us of his contract. What would it cost us from Seattle's point of view?
isn't it 8-3-1 ?We’re going to have a lot of players we can’t protect, especially if we go the 4-4-1 route which seems likely.
isn't it 8-3-1 ?
isn't it 8-3-1 ?
Players in Okposo’s salary range with similar production:
Turris, Saad, Stepan, Kovalchuk, Marleau, Jordan Staal, Eberle, Ehlers, Oshie, Zajac, Steen, Hertl, Pominville, Zucker, Foligno, Neidereiter, Little, Backlund,
Other expensive players providing similar or less offence for the buck:
Toews, Kopitar, Perry, Voracek, Spezza, Krejci, Ryan, Evander Kane, Van Reimsdyk, Kesler, Erickson, Backes, Lucic, Callahan, Neal, Ladd, Schwartz, Carter.
I get the concern down the road, but right now is Okposo really the burden you say he is?
Wouldn’t Dahlin be eligible due to his pro-seasons in Sweden? That’s how I was counting but I could be wrong.7-3-1 or 4-4-1
I don't see why Buffalo would go 4-4-1 when they still won't have 4 draft eligible D-man that are worth protecting. Dahlin won't be eligible, so all I count are Ristolainen, McCabe, and Pilut if he's going to be eligible (not sure about him). Bogosian, Scandella, and anyone else can be exposed, no problem.
As for Okposo, Botterill won't be able to send him off anywhere. Only hope is a compliance buy-out via the next CBA.
Semi-off topic, but Buffalo won't have any problems protecting important players in the expansion draft. Even marginal players like Bogosian, Scandella, and Sheary are pending UFAs that summer, making them pointless targets for Seattle.
7-3-1 or 4-4-1
I don't see why Buffalo would go 4-4-1 when they still won't have 4 draft eligible D-man that are worth protecting. Dahlin won't be eligible, so all I count are Ristolainen, McCabe, and Pilut if he's going to be eligible (not sure about him). Bogosian, Scandella, and anyone else can be exposed, no problem.
As for Okposo, Botterill won't be able to send him off anywhere. Only hope is a compliance buy-out via the next CBA.
Semi-off topic, but Buffalo won't have any problems protecting important players in the expansion draft. Even marginal players like Bogosian, Scandella, and Sheary are pending UFAs that summer, making them pointless targets for Seattle.
Wouldn’t Dahlin be eligible due to his pro-seasons in Sweden? That’s how I was counting but I could be wrong.
Players in Okposo’s salary range with similar production:
Turris, Saad, Stepan, Kovalchuk, Marleau, Jordan Staal, Eberle, Ehlers, Oshie, Zajac, Steen, Hertl, Pominville, Zucker, Foligno, Neidereiter, Little, Backlund,
Other expensive players providing similar or less offence for the buck:
Toews, Kopitar, Perry, Voracek, Spezza, Krejci, Ryan, Evander Kane, Van Reimsdyk, Kesler, Erickson, Backes, Lucic, Callahan, Neal, Ladd, Schwartz, Carter.
I get the concern down the road, but right now is Okposo really the burden you say he is?
I don’t think I’d give up a first.I'd give up a first for them to take Okposo, probably wouldn't be enough though. Maybe something can be arranged to help them fill out their roster with extra B prospects. Them taking Okposo for those final years would be ideal though.
I don’t think I’d give up a first.
That also included Vegas taking William Karlsson instead of Josh Anderson and Joonas Korpisalo. That worked out pretty well for Vegas, lol!Vegas took a first and a second for Clarkson. And that’s for a player who does nothing.
I assume that’s be close to the cost.
That also included Vegas taking William Karlsson instead of Josh Anderson and Joonas Korpisalo. That worked out pretty well for Vegas, lol!
Karlsson was the expansion draft pick. Clarkson wasn't eligible for the expansion draft.I'd give them those picks to take Okposo, not for a trade.