A bridge deal would pretty much be a fireable offense at this point.
After Morrissey, there is nothing in the organisation that is all of young, proven and certain on the back end. We're in a cap crunch and all that, but if there is a situation in which you cannot afford to take any risks, this is it. Not one of our defensemen is signed for more than three years. One of the two guys who could be cornerstones is likely gone in two years. The prospect pipeline is devoid of top pairing talent. Buff is aging, and the rest are dime in a dozen -type.
Morrissey needs to be locked up long term. If it costs a lot, so be it. We cannot afford to bridge him and then have another Trouba situation in two years.
There is no reason (publicly at least) to suspect anything like the Trouba situation in 2 years, nor the Subban situation either. We are going to be forced to bridge a lot of players for cap reasons going forward.
That said, I think the failure to get Trouba locked up makes it much more important to have Morrissey safely extended for at least 6 years. 8 would be better. I agree with your summation of the risk management involved.
Also, based on last year's play, I'm inclined to think that Morrissey will be the better player over the span of their careers. How good would JoMo be with Trouba's size?
I digress. Within reason, pay Morrissey what it takes. If that means moving another player, so be it.
What's the top number for Morrissey for an 8 year term? 6.25? 6.5? More? Less? Ehlers got 8% of CH for 7 years. That would be 6.36 now. Is matching the Ehlers contract about right for Morrissey? Or does his lack of scoring drop it below that?