What system do the Penguins run?

Cloned

Begging for Bega
Aug 25, 2003
79,298
64,812
Hey all, Oilers fan here. Over on the Oilers board there has been an interview with the Oilers assistant coach who indicated they were going to change the team’s systems to something that fosters speed and puck possession. He also said it is something similar to what two or three other teams in the NHL run. My mind immediately went to the Penguins as a possibility.

What kind of systems do you guys run, in terms of forechecking and breakout? I’ve tried googling and YouTubing but it is difficult to find clips of a controlled breakout or a full forecheck. Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance! :)
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
I’m not an X’s and O’s guy but it’s the D man’s job to get it to our forwards quickly so they can transition and bring it into the O zone as quick as possible. Once there different lines do it slightly different but important to possess the puck and wear down the opposition and we have the forward depth to do that.

Once a turnover is created our forwards have to push back hard and be in good position otherwise it can break down as our D isn’t a strong shutdown defense.

Our biggest strength are our forwards so we play a game to maximise that. Teams have caught up to us with speed so there may be some adjustments to how we play.
 

Turin

Registered User
Feb 27, 2018
22,163
25,608
Not really sure on the small details, but they overload the strong side in the D-Zone, don’t pressure the points aggressively and break out mostly with chips and small simple passes to get speed through the neutral zone. I’m not sure how often they do it in the RS, but in the playoffs they’ve often gone into the 1-2-2 forecheck, where they use speed to disrupt the neutral zone.

It can change due to opponent though. Overall I think most teams play a similar system.. communication, mindset and of course the actual roster play bigger parts imo. I’m not sure the Oilers have the personnel to run it as effectively, but maybe they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cloned

Cloned

Begging for Bega
Aug 25, 2003
79,298
64,812
Not really sure on the small details, but they overload the strong side in the D-Zone, don’t pressure the points aggressively and break out mostly with chips and small simple passes to get speed through the neutral zone. I’m not sure how often they do it in the RS, but in the playoffs they’ve often gone into the 1-2-2 forecheck, where they use speed to disrupt the neutral zone.

It can change due to opponent though. Overall I think most teams play a similar system.. communication, mindset and of course the actual roster play bigger parts imo. I’m not sure the Oilers have the personnel to run it as effectively, but maybe they do.

Thanks, much appreciated!
 

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,190
16,602
Moncton, NB
Outlet passes from the defensive zone, pressure through the neutral zone, and puck support in the offensive zone.

Speed from the forwards is the key ingredient.
 
Last edited:

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,190
16,602
Moncton, NB
Also, Sullivan uses different forechecks (both in the NZ and OZ) depending on the team. However, the main purpose is to pressure the team into turnovers.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,421
25,284
I’m not an X’s and O’s guy but it’s the D man’s job to get it to our forwards quickly so they can transition and bring it into the O zone as quick as possible.

I haven't checked for sure, but I think its quite noticeable in our zone exit stats just how quick our dmen get it to the forwards - the forwards make a lot more exits compared to Dallas.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
Also, Sullivan uses different forechecks (both in the NZ and OZ) depending on the team. However, the main purpose is to pressure the team into turnovers.

And not so much last season but before that we’d try not to let them get good shots from in close and down the middle. Out wide was fine for an easier save/block then we’d battle to win the puck and take off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,023
67,649
Pittsburgh
10 years ago you could sit there and talk about what system teams play. Not any more. The game is so detailed. That is why players like Datsyuk aren't seen as much who are ultra creative. Players are given very specific details to react to a situation. The core ideas of the NHL anymore are variations of a 2-3 or a 1-2-2, but hot damn they play nothing like old variation 2-3/1-2-2s.

As I always say, I would kill to sit with Sully to hear his details.
 

oobga

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 1, 2003
23,198
18,195
Was Mike Johnston making the Pens players do stupid stuff? They really turned around after they finally replaced him.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,520
Was Mike Johnston making the Pens players do stupid stuff? They really turned around after they finally replaced him.

His second season he didn’t have faith in our D. Fair enough it wasn’t great but then he played a more defensive system which doesn’t work to our strengths. Should have played a more attacking game and if the D didn’t hold up pester JR for more help on D. That mistake cost him his job. Whether he would have made long term who knows. Worked out great for us though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oobga

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
54,327
18,745
Pittsburgh
The system is getting the puck up to the forwards as quickly as they can by forcing the other team to dump the puck or keep them to the outside and either carry it out or hit stretch passes from the blueline out quickly. It's all predicated on speed in all aspects. What ends up happening is teams drop back into the safe 1-2-2 D-coverage with the D-men dropped back the hash marks of the circles to not get burned by having them blow by them. That allows for easy zone entry. Sometimes the other team will do like last year and go the 1-2-1-1 where one D-man stays back at the hash marks and the strong side forward and D-man pressure the puck carrier causing more dump ins that the D-man back easily gathers up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD

billybudd

Registered User
Feb 1, 2012
22,049
2,249
Good coaches these days (and Sullivan is one) will change the forecheck or breakout between commercial breaks if something's not working. McClellan's most-likely talking about emphasis, not rote-copying some serendipitous, static grand strategy of some other hockey club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Turin

EightyOne

My posts are jokes. And hockey is just a game.
Nov 23, 2016
12,697
12,034
Lol

System

Lol


Pretty sure they run "attack, attack, attack some more, oh, and just try not to fall on Murray or something"
 
  • Like
Reactions: SouthGeorge

SouthGeorge

Registered User
May 2, 2018
7,960
3,078
We run a 4-1. Little to no defense and a lot of breakaways.

Joking aside - I wish the Pens did something like SNU so we could pick Sullivans brain. I just want to ask him two questions 1) What is the most important piece of ice in his opinion and 2) When a defensemen gets the puck in a pressure situation why is his partner hugging the opposite boards. All I want to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EightyOne and BHD

Tweed

Registered User
Jun 25, 2006
4,025
1,203
Hey all, Oilers fan here. Over on the Oilers board there has been an interview with the Oilers assistant coach who indicated they were going to change the team’s systems to something that fosters speed and puck possession. He also said it is something similar to what two or three other teams in the NHL run. My mind immediately went to the Penguins as a possibility.

What kind of systems do you guys run, in terms of forechecking and breakout? I’ve tried googling and YouTubing but it is difficult to find clips of a controlled breakout or a full forecheck. Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance! :)


Our system is actually pretty complicated, and involves having our center pass it up the middle and our best defenseman covering the same guy as our second best defenseman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob and EightyOne

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,190
16,602
Moncton, NB
(in Sully's voice)

" We want our more skilled guys to make skilled plays - as long as they're the right play. We have some skilled guys, and we don't want to stifle their creativity. We want them to read the situation and react accordingly."
 
  • Like
Reactions: EightyOne

Jesse

Registered User
Jun 28, 2005
1,687
1,634
Pittsburgh
Hey all, Oilers fan here. Over on the Oilers board there has been an interview with the Oilers assistant coach who indicated they were going to change the team’s systems to something that fosters speed and puck possession. He also said it is something similar to what two or three other teams in the NHL run. My mind immediately went to the Penguins as a possibility.

What kind of systems do you guys run, in terms of forechecking and breakout? I’ve tried googling and YouTubing but it is difficult to find clips of a controlled breakout or a full forecheck. Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance! :)

The Penguins run a 1-2-2 in the neutral zone with an added wrinkle that is generally called a swing. This means the middle "2" will interchange with/join the top "1" to provide dual pressure on the forecheck. They'll press the top forechecker high, and they'll loop a second player in to provide pressure on top of the first forechecker. That first forechecker rotates into his spot, and the cycle repeats.

Defensively, the Penguins (to the bane of all of us) run a puck-side overload. That means they attack the puck side of the ice four strong, generally leaving one player back in the slot to protect the back door.

Offensively it's basically no holds barred. They gain possession, cycle, and generally just run wild. There's mostly no sense in attempting to discern commonalities when 87/71/81 are out there just doing whatever comes naturally.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad