What probability do you feel Ovechkin has to catch Gretzky now? (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

tread102

Registered User
Mar 17, 2008
520
297
Team awards are _team awards_ . [Mod]
Yet almost every hockey expert considers sid superior. Sid is still playing at an insanely high level. Still one of the top players in the league. Ovi has been reduced to a one truck pony.
 

tread102

Registered User
Mar 17, 2008
520
297
Defensemen and goalies are second class hockey players everybody knows that. It's like with acting. Clint Eastwood and Arnold Schwarzenegger are the stars (forwards) and Gary Oldman and Steve Buscemi are the supporting actors (defensemen, goalies).

Arnold was a very poor choice for a star actor! Lol and Steve buscemi is great Arnie couldn’t carry his jock strap
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plural

JasonRoseEh

Registered User
Oct 23, 2018
2,933
2,347
I'm not trying to talk Ovie down, but the top 4 is cemented in stone. Plante, Sawchuk, Hasek, Hall are four goalies that have a case. Harvey as a D for sure. Rocket Richard as a forward for sure. There are tops 3 places up for grabs after that (assuming only one goalie belongs).

What is Ovie's case over Jagr for instance? Jagr's level of dominance was longer and more impressive. He won scoring races in the dead puck era despite missing 19 games. Or Believau? Even Bobby Hull, people forget that he actually set scoring records. I mean, can anyone honestly say Ovie was a better hockey player than Crosby?

IF Ovi reaches 895 there is more of a case, I'll admit that. Preferably in combo with another SC. But otherwise I can't see why.
At this point there is zero case for Richard over Ovechkin. Both Crosby and Ovechkin are top 10 players ever and I have Crosby exactly one spot ahead. You guys choose where they are in that stratus, but they're there and they're not done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RuthlessLieutenant

tread102

Registered User
Mar 17, 2008
520
297
I don't understand this argument against Ovechkin. He scores a lot of goals... by shooting more than anyone else, it kinda makes sense?

shooting percentage has to play a part. Ovi is going to go down as the most prolific shooter ever he’s going to end up with 500-1000 more shots than number 2. That’s not even counting all the shots into the defenders shins or wide of the goal. Gretzky was a playmaker first goal scorer 2nd how many goal would he have scored if he played the game like Ovi.
 

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
14,710
11,536
What did Gretzky say about shots?

You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.

It seems that the greatest hockey player ever approves of Ovie's shot volume.

Such a weird criticism. :huh:

I think people have a problem moreso with the idea of Ovechkin being called the best goal scorer, when he has a very inaccurate shot.
 

ALLCAPSALLTHETIME

Great Dane! Love that Eller feller.
Oct 10, 2009
9,234
4,898
British Columbia, Canada
I think people have a problem moreso with the idea of Ovechkin being called the best goal scorer, when he has a very inaccurate shot.

Perhaps those people should actually watch him play. He has pinpoint accuracy. Watch where he shoots. In particular, watch for the shot that is above the right pad and below the blocker. That's an area he has been working on lately, with a lot of success.

It's just harder to score these days, believe it or not. What with giant Michelin men in net.

Shooting percentages are a lot lower than the pond hockey of the 1980s through early 1990s for a reason.
 

abo9

Registered User
Jun 25, 2017
9,087
7,179
shooting percentage has to play a part. Ovi is going to go down as the most prolific shooter ever he’s going to end up with 500-1000 more shots than number 2. That’s not even counting all the shots into the defenders shins or wide of the goal. Gretzky was a playmaker first goal scorer 2nd how many goal would he have scored if he played the game like Ovi.

Does it really matter at the end of the day? The fact that Ovechkin manages to shoot that much more than everyone else has value. Why does no one else shoot as much, when it obviously produces results? And Gretzky could have played a different game and scored even more goals, but he did not. Imo, it's a compliment to Gretzky to be beaten by a specialist like Ovechkin. It really is indicative of how dominant he was in the offensive aspect of the game for such devotion to goalscoring from a generational player to even be in the conversation of beating the record.

Also, while I hate to bring a topic that's been beaten to death, the 80's were a higher scoring era, so that would influence shooting percentages as well. Of course it's gonna be higher when goalies have sub-900 save percentages.
 

JasonRoseEh

Registered User
Oct 23, 2018
2,933
2,347
shooting percentage has to play a part. Ovi is going to go down as the most prolific shooter ever he’s going to end up with 500-1000 more shots than number 2. That’s not even counting all the shots into the defenders shins or wide of the goal. Gretzky was a playmaker first goal scorer 2nd how many goal would he have scored if he played the game like Ovi.
It plays absolutely zero part. This isn't basketball, efficiency doesn't matter just the total. It's hard enough to get 3 shots on goal let alone 6. It's a complete non argument made by people with an agenda to knock Ovechkin off his pedestal. It's embarrassing.

This isn't 1982, Ovechkin isn't teeing it up from just inside the blue line and scoring routinely against 5'8 pylons in goal who all sport sub .900 SV% while leaving a wake of subpar defensemen reeling on the ice, who all likely rip a pack of darts every single day. Terrible take.
 
Last edited:

filinski77

Registered User
Feb 12, 2017
2,619
4,290
Since Ovechkin entered the league he has 250 more goals than the next closest player. That’s like five 50 goal seasons worth of goals.

That’s just insane.
Assuming that Marleau retires after this season: Ovechkin will have about 52% more career goals than the next active player in the NHL. Has there ever been a gap that large amongst active players? It's just ridiculous.
 

filinski77

Registered User
Feb 12, 2017
2,619
4,290
So funny when people try to use shots as a NEGATIVE here lol. Getting a shot off is so much harder today than it was in the 80's, and is an extremely valuable skill.

Here are the NHL leaders for # of times leading the league in shots:

Ovi - 11
Hull Sr. -7
Bure/Esposito/Gretzky/Dionne - 4
Howe/Bourque/Hull Jr. - 3

I'm sure if all the other top goal scorers in league history could have generated more shots, they would have won more (retro) rockets lol.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,588
10,178
Assuming that Marleau retires after this season: Ovechkin will have about 52% more career goals than the next active player in the NHL. Has there ever been a gap that large amongst active players? It's just ridiculous.

The answer is no - no other player has ever had a 50% + gap between them and the next goal scorer over a period of 15 years (I realize this year makes 16. My data is for 15 years, but I doubt 16 is all that different). Look at the "Lead over next best, first 15 years" row.

Esposito had a 45% gap. Gretzky had 30%. Richard had a 40% gap.

Greatest Goal Scorers of all time
*As of 3/26/20Ovi*Brett MarioGretzBossyEspoBobby HoweRichard
Career Total Goals706741690894573717610801544
Career Tot. Goals Rank8411122618231
Career Tot. Adjusted (adj.) Goals798738616758461671644925653
Career Tot. Adj goals Rank3617463912110
Goal Scoring Titles933526755
Peak Season goals658685926976544950
Peak adjusted Season 727871695865576554
Peak Adjusted Season Rank (All time)2136454541384
Peak Season relative to next best of the era^^8.30%-6.5%-8%7%-25%10%8%4%2%
Same as above, adjusted^^5.9%10.0%-9.0%-12%-26%12.0%6.6%9.0%-17%
Lead over next best, 1st 5 yrs17.0%-15%6.8%21.0%19.0%-53%-3.3%-36%24.0%
Lead over next best, 1st 10 yrs40.0%2.8%11.0%41.0%6.0%-6.0%25.0%-11%53.0%
Lead over next best, 1st 15 yrs53.0%10.0%4.6%30.0%-23%45.0%30.0%9.0%40.0%
Lead over 10, first 5 seasons59.0%17.0%53.0%80.0%56.0%-6.0%22.7%15.0%77.0%
Lead over 10, first 10 seasons60.0%41.0%32.0%79.0%79.0%59.0%72.0%107%108%
Lead over 10, first 15 seasons86.0%44.0%35.0%70.0%31.0%85.0%105%149%166%
*As of 3/26/20Ovi*Brett MarioGretzBossyEspoBobby HoweRichard
Career GPG0.610.580.750.60.760.560.570.450.56
Career Adj GPG0.6920.5820.6730.5100.6130.5230.6060.5230.668
All time rank Adjusted GPG***162947573
**GPG lead over next best, 1st 5 yrs17%-16%11%18%-5%-50%-19%-34%22%
**GPG lead over next best, 1st 10 yrs13%-19%8%0%-12%-15%17%-13%41%
**GPG lead over next best, 1st 15 years15%-27%21%16%-4%-13%4%-9%16%
**GPG lead over 10, first 5 yrs45%36%44%60%44%0%19%9%50%
**GPG lead over 10, 1st 10 yrs50%45%49%52%38%41%47%55%68%
**GPG lead over 10, 1st 15 yrs52%28%64%34%41%44%61%60%87%
**Times Led NHL in GPG936315835
50 goal seasons856995501
Quanity of NHL 50 goal seasons in their 1st 15 yrs22789011068^301011
*As of 3/26/20Ovi*Brett MarioGretzBossyEspoBobby HoweRichard
% of 50 goal seasons / 1st 1536%6.40%6.70%8%13%16.7%50%0%100%
Adjusted 50 goal seasons1155525557
Playoff Goals65103761228561626882
Playoff GPG0.510.510.710.590.660.470.520.430.62
Playoff Adj. Goals68.598.86898.7164.7553.855.865.271.4
Playoff Adjusted GPG0.5350.4890.6360.4750.5020.4140.4690.4150.541
Playoff Adj. GPG Rank***351649782
**Minimum ~ half the games played
***Among the players on this list
^ 10 seasons only
^^ERA definition for each player (this varies depending on when scoring changed significantly)
^^Ovechkin: 2005-present
^^Bobby Hull: Just included pre-1967 expansion. Expansion would include Esposito's 76 goal season, but I don't think that was humanly possible pre-expansion
^^Esposito: I counted '67 to 79-80. Includes expansion but not the 1980s GPG explosion
^^Howe: For raw totals, didn't include Richard's '44-45 because NHL scoring differed too much
^^Richard: For adjusted and league wide, the sample includes Howe's '52.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

filinski77

Registered User
Feb 12, 2017
2,619
4,290
The answer is no - no other player has ever had a 50% + gap between them and the next goal scorer over a period of 15 years (I realize this year makes 16. My data is for 15 years, but I doubt 16 is all that different). Look at the "Lead over next best, first 15 years" row.

Esposito had a 45% gap. Gretzky had 30%. Richard had a 40% gap.

Greatest Goal Scorers of all time
*As of 3/26/20Ovi*Brett MarioGretzBossyEspoBobby HoweRichard
Career Total Goals706741690894573717610801544
Career Tot. Goals Rank8411122618231
Career Tot. Adjusted (adj.) Goals798738616758461671644925653
Career Tot. Adj goals Rank3617463912110
Goal Scoring Titles933526755
Peak Season goals658685926976544950
Peak adjusted Season 727871695865576554
Peak Adjusted Season Rank (All time)2136454541384
Peak Season relative to next best of the era^^8.30%-6.5%-8%7%-25%10%8%4%2%
Same as above, adjusted^^5.9%10.0%-9.0%-12%-26%12.0%6.6%9.0%-17%
Lead over next best, 1st 5 yrs17.0%-15%6.8%21.0%19.0%-53%-3.3%-36%24.0%
Lead over next best, 1st 10 yrs40.0%2.8%11.0%41.0%6.0%-6.0%25.0%-11%53.0%
Lead over next best, 1st 15 yrs53.0%10.0%4.6%30.0%-23%45.0%30.0%9.0%40.0%
Lead over 10, first 5 seasons59.0%17.0%53.0%80.0%56.0%-6.0%22.7%15.0%77.0%
Lead over 10, first 10 seasons60.0%41.0%32.0%79.0%79.0%59.0%72.0%107%108%
Lead over 10, first 15 seasons86.0%44.0%35.0%70.0%31.0%85.0%105%149%166%
*As of 3/26/20Ovi*Brett MarioGretzBossyEspoBobby HoweRichard
Career GPG0.610.580.750.60.760.560.570.450.56
Career Adj GPG0.6920.5820.6730.5100.6130.5230.6060.5230.668
All time rank Adjusted GPG***162947573
**GPG lead over next best, 1st 5 yrs17%-16%11%18%-5%-50%-19%-34%22%
**GPG lead over next best, 1st 10 yrs13%-19%8%0%-12%-15%17%-13%41%
**GPG lead over next best, 1st 15 years15%-27%21%16%-4%-13%4%-9%16%
**GPG lead over 10, first 5 yrs45%36%44%60%44%0%19%9%50%
**GPG lead over 10, 1st 10 yrs50%45%49%52%38%41%47%55%68%
**GPG lead over 10, 1st 15 yrs52%28%64%34%41%44%61%60%87%
**Times Led NHL in GPG936315835
50 goal seasons856995501
Quanity of NHL 50 goal seasons in their 1st 15 yrs22789011068^301011
*As of 3/26/20Ovi*Brett MarioGretzBossyEspoBobby HoweRichard
% of 50 goal seasons / 1st 1536%6.40%6.70%8%13%16.7%50%0%100%
Adjusted 50 goal seasons1155525557
Playoff Goals65103761228561626882
Playoff GPG0.510.510.710.590.660.470.520.430.62
Playoff Adj. Goals68.598.86898.7164.7553.855.865.271.4
Playoff Adjusted GPG0.5350.4890.6360.4750.5020.4140.4690.4150.541
Playoff Adj. GPG Rank***351649782
**Minimum ~ half the games played
***Among the players on this list
^ 10 seasons only
^^ERA definition for each player (this varies depending on when scoring changed significantly)
^^Ovechkin: 2005-present
^^Bobby Hull: Just included pre-1967 expansion. Expansion would include Esposito's 76 goal season, but I don't think that was humanly possible pre-expansion
^^Esposito: I counted '67 to 79-80. Includes expansion but not the 1980s GPG explosion
^^Howe: For raw totals, didn't include Richard's '44-45 because NHL scoring differed too much
^^Richard: For adjusted and league wide, the sample includes Howe's '52.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Right, but not even over 15 years (which is obviously still impressive) - I mean as in just an active players. So also including guys that started before Ovi came into the league (Staal etc).
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,588
10,178
Right, but not even over 15 years (which is obviously still impressive) - I mean as in just an active players. So also including guys that started before Ovi came into the league (Staal etc).

Ah, yes. That's right - 15 year spans vs all active NHL players are two different things.
 

canucklover123

Registered User
Oct 22, 2013
2,677
2,065
Winning is the most important thing.

Ironically only used in an argument as a deterrent lol......
Unfortunate, you don't push that agenda on inferior players who won a lot.

Goals are the most important thing in hockey, Ovi is the best in the world at it. Does that make him the best player nah... because other items even though don't carry as much weight are important and he lacks in some of that.

But oddly enough, were in an Ovi goal thread lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad