Burrowsaurus
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2013
- 42,400
- 16,037
I forget. When we traded ya shin did we know their pick was #2?But if their pick lands #1 and we get Lafreniere, it'll easily rival the Yashin for Spezza/Chara deal.
I forget. When we traded ya shin did we know their pick was #2?But if their pick lands #1 and we get Lafreniere, it'll easily rival the Yashin for Spezza/Chara deal.
Yes they did.I forget. When we traded ya shin did we know their pick was #2?
Personally, I write off any season where a player misses training camp.
Yeah, it's important to factor this in. The same applies to injuries incurred very early into the season.
People were pretty brutal when it came to Nylander's contract but that season was always going to be a write-off.
Once players fall behind, it's very hard for them to make up the lost ground later on.
Hossa didnt shy away from contact he engaged, polar opposites. I actually cant think of two players that are more different in my opinion. I am talking about visually watching him give up against boston, it was almost unbelievable.
Incredibly I cant find the entire sequence where Hrudey breaks down several of his plays giving up on the puck. I guess the leafs really do have some serious power in what is released in the media. It all stemmed from this play though
Anyway I think yes he could engage more from a physical stand point he is a long way from developing into the complete player he can become. However when you couple it all with his history, playing style id be suprised. His social interactions also dont suggest he is the hardest guy and he doesn seem to mind that extravigant lifestyle.
.
Doesn't Tampa Bay have a couple?
Demelo has been converted into a 3rd round 2020 pick. Tierney will probably also be dealt at some point.Deserves credit on everything aside from the high 1st. He got a first, we absolutely lucked into it being a top 3ish pick.
I still don’t think the inclusions of Tierny or Demelo were good moves whatsoever, but they were warm bodies to go with the prospect (Norris) and picks we got that will likely be apart of the Sens future.
I think the frustration with DeMelo was he was a guy that wasn't qualified and could have been signed as a UFA. As a result, he was underrated upon his arrival. He really exceeded expectations including SJ's expectations based on the contract they signed him to.Demelo has been converted into a 3rd round 2020 pick. Tierney will probably also be dealt at some point.
I find it funny that some people would have been happier had we gotten a 2020 3rd rounder in the trade instead of Demelo.
Well we got that AND two years of Demelo.
It was a smart play imho.
I wouldn't have been happy with a 3rd, as I wasn't happy with Demelo, likewise with Tierny.Demelo has been converted into a 3rd round 2020 pick. Tierney will probably also be dealt at some point.
I find it funny that some people would have been happier had we gotten a 2020 3rd rounder in the trade instead of Demelo.
Well we got that AND two years of Demelo.
It was a smart play imho.
I think dorion sees them as stop gaps too. If Tierney nets a 2nd and 3rd, the trade becomesI wouldn't have been happy with a 3rd, as I wasn't happy with Demelo, likewise with Tierny.
Could care less about the 1.5 years he spent here, he meant nothing for the franchise other than a placeholder
I wouldn't have been happy with a 3rd, as I wasn't happy with Demelo, likewise with Tierny.
Could care less about the 1.5 years he spent here, he meant nothing for the franchise other than a placeholder
Which I see as no big deal whatsoever. It’s very easy to get replacement level players through waivers, we finished last and 2nd last with Demelo, the difference between Demelo and someone else would’t have done anything positive or negative in the long run, we would still have finished last and 2nd last.Without DD we’re forcing Jaros/Brann/Lajoie or another Hainsey type. He was a valuable piece.
I disagree, Demelo was arguably our best defence last year. Without him who knows we might have been down there with detroit. We were in almost every game this year, made it more exciting for the fans and the younger guys will be even more hungry next year with added confidence instead of having gone through a deflating season with frequent blowouts most games.Which I see as no big deal whatsoever. It’s very easy to get replacement level players through waivers, we finished last and 2nd last with Demelo, the difference between Demelo and someone else would’t have done anything positive or negative in the long run, we would still have finished last and 2nd last.
Being a warm body isn’t a valuable piece. Warm bodies are the easiest thing to get, because they literally are just there to take up space for a time frame where you try and get someone who is valuable for the teams future to take it.
Easily the most over-rated Sen the past 2 seasons for me, without competition.I disagree, Demelo was arguably our best defence last year. Without him who knows we might have been down there with detroit. We were in almost every game this year, made it more exciting for the fans and the younger guys will be even more hungry next year with added confidence instead of having gone through a deflating season with frequent blowouts most games.
That sounds pretty good when the rest of our defence wont win games either, but will lose them. Branstrom and chabot are better off learning defence from demelo than some old vet who is too slow to actually demonstrate what proper defence looks like.Easily the most over-rated Sen the past 2 seasons for me, without competition.
He's a stable bottom pairing guy who won't lose, or win, games for you
Demelo has essentially the same experience in the NHL as Chabot, aside from the big minutes and tough assignments Chabot already gets. He has 60 more games played.That sounds pretty good when the rest of our defence wont win games either, but will lose them. Branstrom and chabot are better off learning defence from demelo than some old vet who is too slow to actually demonstrate what proper defence looks like.
Which I see as no big deal whatsoever. It’s very easy to get replacement level players through waivers, we finished last and 2nd last with Demelo, the difference between Demelo and someone else would’t have done anything positive or negative in the long run, we would still have finished last and 2nd last.
Being a warm body isn’t a valuable piece. Warm bodies are the easiest thing to get, because they literally are just there to take up space for a time frame where you try and get someone who is valuable for the teams future to take it.
At the time, like most I thought it was a terrible trade..
now I’ve adjusted to life without EK65, and moved on, hindsight shows it really was a good trade but mostly down to luck - namely, EK and SJS not doing very well.
How much of that is because of Karlsson? That’s tough to know, and it would probably be unfair to pin the blame solely on one player. But former Sharks forward John Scott revealed in January on his “Dropping the Gloves” podcast that Karlsson’s personality might not be meshing very well with everyone else.
After mentioning that he had dinner with some of his former Sharks teammates, Scott said he asked them about Karlsson.
“I’m not going to say who answered the question, but they’re like, yeah, he’s terrible. He’s checked out, he’s not invested, and he just does not want to play, really. Maybe I’m paraphrasing words,” Scott said.
Scott’s co-host added: “We asked them, what’s he like? And all they could say is that he talks a lot. That was the only thing they said about him. He talks a lot.”
“Talks a lot and doesn’t really do much,” Scott said. “It’s concerning. We were talking to guys on the Sharks, and they know. I don’t see how he lasts there. I really don’t.”
Pretty interesting thread on the sharks board. Its about a quote from John Scott on Erik Karlsson;
Most of the Sharks fans are somewhat in denial and saying that Scott is lying basically, but it really doesnt seem that hard to me based on what we saw from the lifeless Sharks this season...
Bottom line is that Karlsson was King Karlsson here. On and off the ice. His play allowed him to reach that status, and it seemed to match his big and confident personality.
Hes not the same player on the ice that he was in Ottawa anymore, and while Im sure hes dialed the alpha male/boss of the room vibe back considerably since he arrived in SJ as the new guy, Im sure that hes still adjusting to his new life as a "former top dog". And that might be harder for him to do than he expected, if I had a guess, the cocky and vocal guy that he is going to be sometimes will rub some people the wrong way. It did in Ottawa, even with his status there. And I remember getting a vibe of a lot more general sadness among the remaining players when Stone left as opposed to when Karlsson did.
Just my 2 cents anyways..
Checking out was something he did here too when things were going really poorly imo. Add in that he had a baby right at the start of the season and has had injury issues popping up every time he gets into a grove pretty much his whole time there and I can believe that he's not dialed in there.
As for Stone vs Karlsson, that's to be expected. We had Karlsson is getting traded drama for 9 straight months including a couple false alarms that he had been traded. Players had lots of time to come to terms with the reality that he was getting shipped out, while with Stone it happened at the deadline and there was always a glimmer of hope he'd be re-signed and they had games to focus on.
I suspect a new season along with being more adapted to life as a new father will reset his "give a crap" meter, which could result in a quick turn around for both him and the team.
I think that a good deal of credit is due to management for understanding the necessity for a rebuild. We had Duchene, Karlsson and Stone and were not lighting the world on fire outside of the 2017 miracle run. I think it's something that had to happen, and kudos to management for getting assets for players that would have walked otherwise. Keeping 1 or 2 of them would not have changed our position today - in fact it would have made it substantially worse.
As for Dorion, he probably walked blindly into a solid deal that can lift the franchise, but it wasn't for lack of vision. This team in its current state is no better off with Karlsson than without.