Who knows? I know.
Just because a poster was misinformed, doesn't mean it was true. 12/13 CBA is posted. As is the 2005 one in an archive. Hackett was not going to be eligable for waivers.
He was sent up and down a half dozen times between buffalo and rochester the next year without touching waivers. He first hit waivers Dec of 2014. His 5th NHL season. All public information.
Waivers had nothing to do with it.
I found it; it had to do with his contract, you're right. Not waivers, though again I think I was remembering the quote above.
Minnesota had to give more because Kuemper had the leverage. Harding had MS, and broke his foot. Your worth what they are willing to pay you. I don't begrudge Kuemper having an agent willing to play hardball.
Except Kuemper didn't prove anything for a big contract. And that's why partly Minnesota made a huge mistake in trading Hackett as they had zero leverage.
Hmmm. Do you think Hackett may have possibly racked up AHL starts while Kuemper was in the NHL?
They wanted to give Hackett more starting time. Kuemper sparsely played in the NHL that season. You possibly think they wanted to give Hackett more reps as they were thinking he was going to be backup the next season? What's the point of having a goalie that doesn't play? They need reps.
Kuemper wasnt the only option. It was the Option they chose.
Kuemper was the only option after the trade deadline. They didn't have another capable goaltenders. Who did they have after Kuemper? JDD?
Also goalies get hot and cold a lot of times. Even if Hackett struggled for a season, it happens. Kuemper fizzled here big time though.
But the fact remains trading Hackett was a mistake, because they either had to bring up a goalie that wasn't really ready or scramble to find a goalie. They mishandled the Harding situation big time and signed Backstrom to a ridiculous deal. They got lucky with Dubnyk...
Ultimately, when Harding was diagnosed with MS, they should have moved on. Kept him on LTIR and in the organization (maybe use the compliance buyout), but had Hackett as the backup and Kuemper developing as a full time starter in the AHL.
In 2012-2013, Minnesota shouldn't have been aiming for the playoffs. They should have let their prospects develop and revisit any trades in the offseason. The seller's market was hot at the time and the prices were extraordinarily high. It wasn't also enough time to evaluate Harding and his MS diagnosis nor any of the rookies they brought in the previous years. The goaltending was kind of a mess as they had a four headed monster with Backstrom, Harding, Hackett and Kuemper. No one really distinguish themselves as starters. Backstrom was declining, Harding was an unknown entity and Hackett and Kuemper didn't have enough time in the NHL to say they were even capable backups.
The following year they had Harding, Kuemper, Backstrom and Bryzgalov all playing no more than 30 games as none of them distinguish them as starters. The following year because Harding never really recovered, they brought in Dubnyk (which by some miracle became a pretty good starter) as Kuemper and Backstrom didn't even look like starters.
One of the biggest what ifs, is what if Minnesota decided not to move for Pominville at the deadline.