not quite yoda
Registered User
What is plan B for Bob Goodenow now that the season is canceled? How does he get the deal he wants?
espion said:What is plan B for Bob Goodenow now that the season is canceled? How does he get the deal he wants?
espion said:Because...
I e-mailed Ted Leonsis (owner of the Capitals-you can e-mail him via the Caps' web site)...
I asked him what could possibly be Goodenow's plan B; that I couldn't understand how any League offer could get any better for the players...asLeague revenues drop, player salaries have to drop...
Leonsis answered this:
"You are a wise man--it only gets worse for the players now--he overplayed his hand! Ted"
Brewleaguer said:Well if Ted doesn't think it will get worse for him as an owners, he better think again.
espion said:No seriously... he MUST have a plab B! he didn't turn down a 42.5 cap unless he believes there is a way of getting a better number. Even Saskin said Saturday: "I can't imagine getting an offer that gets any worse".
Agreed.go kim johnsson said:Plan B for Goodenow is to wait....
BTW, email any owner you want, espically one of the hard line owners. It is laughable at best if you expected any other answer, even if it was clear the owners were going to lose this.
go kim johnsson said:They also have to get working on a new TV deal because there is a very good chance that ESPN will pull the plug on them.
go kim johnsson said:Plan B for Goodenow is to wait. The longer this goes the better he looks in the union because he can say he was right. The owners best offer will come some time in the spring (May), because they would have to sell tickets and sponsorships and such for the next season. They also have to get working on a new TV deal because there is a very good chance that ESPN will pull the plug on them. They also have to figure out an entry draft. This is when the big money owners are going to start the speak up. They aren't going to let the Wirtz, Jacobs and other idiots ruin this for them, completely.
I think Bill Daly left something when he said the owners want to have a deal done in order to do this. They do not want to have to resort to the thought of replacement players.
If not, I don't think the players union will hold together enough to last through another canceled season.
BTW, email any owner you want, espically one of the hard line owners. It is laughable at best if you expected any other answer, even if it was clear the owners were going to lose this.
RangerBoy said:This situation has already been ruined.On the brink of disaster,the NHL refuses to negotiate a higher cap than $42.5 million knowing the damage being done.Why will anything change in May?Why haven't the big market teams put their foot down by now?They are going to lose all of the playoff revenue
espion said:Ok.
Now anybody have an intelligent opinion out there that doesn't make a joke of this thread?
go kim johnsson said:The situation is already ruined for the sport, this is true. But it is not ruined for the business of the big money teams, because in all liklihood the big money teams won't have that much of a problem brining fans back as long as they lower ticket prices, as long as they come back next season (the Rangers wouldn't have had any playoff revenue anyways). They're not making money right now, but they're also not losing money. They're staying united right now, but that won't be for much longer.
As for why would anything change in May, read my last post again.
The only way to prove that theory is to wait and see if it is true. I think owners and fans of larger markets are going to turn on the 'parity hawks' in the smaller markets. Fans in larger markets originally backing the owners will change when they see how a strict cap might decimate their home team after a dispersal draft. The pendulum had swung to Bettman, but a pendulum swings and momentum often shifts in a battle. I think larger markets, owners, fans and corporations, who were backing Bettman and the hawks up to now, may start to re-think their positions.Any he gets offered later is going to be worse than what he just got offered.
me2 said:The whip hand goes back to the owners in September because that is when the players start losing paycheques again. Maybe the owners crack in September, but the players maybe the crack too.
me2 said:IMHO best chance for a deal was now. The players had less to lose than the owners during the Feb negotiations. The owners had the playoffs & revenue to lose, they had the draft to lose. That leverage is now gone. Both sides will cool down and get back to organised shape. The owners haven't got much left to lose before Christmas.
The whip hand goes back to the owners in September because that is when the players start losing paycheques again. Maybe the owners crack in September, but the players maybe the crack too.
It worth remembering the players biggest chip was the rollback. Less and less players are effected by that as time ticks by.
1. handing out resumes and hope that McDonalds is willing to take a chance on him.espion said:What is plan B for Bob Goodenow now that the season is canceled? How does he get the deal he wants?
If the difference was solely between the 42-45 numbers as some believe, no one would listen to talk of impasse, they would be sent back to the table. That's why it was so important for the NHL to make sure that the PA would not go along with anything else in the deal, re revenue sharing,escalators arbitration etc. Now they can more easily point to a clear disagreement. Keeping in mind that I know nothing of legal gymnastics, though I am quite sneaky.Buffaloed said:It'll happen a lot sooner than that. Look for the NHL to declare an impasse by late April so they can hold a draft and avoid all the problems that will happen if they don't. The players will be under extreme pressure as they watch teams being assembled for the 2005-06 season. Plans will be made to shift games of teams in provinces that don't allow replacement players to provinces that do. The NHL has been scrupulous about not using impasse/replacement player threats or discussing it publically as it's evidence negotiating was not done in good faith. Bettman's assurance that there will be a season next year is practically a guarantee that they have a plan laid out, and realistically they need to implement it at least 30 days before the June 1st signing deadline for players selected in 2003.
I think you are right about what happens next. I think the NHLPA has to understand that fans WILL show up for replacements.Buffaloed said:It'll happen a lot sooner than that. Look for the NHL to declare an impasse by late April so they can hold a draft and avoid all the problems that will happen if they don't. The players will be under extreme pressure as they watch teams being assembled for the 2005-06 season. Plans will be made to shift games of teams in provinces that don't allow replacement players to provinces that do. The NHL has been scrupulous about not using impasse/replacement player threats or discussing it publically as it's evidence negotiating was not done in good faith. Bettman's assurance that there will be a season next year is practically a guarantee that they have a plan laid out, and realistically they need to implement it at least 30 days before the June 1st signing deadline for players selected in 2003.