He was never good but got paid because GMs don't know how to evaluate defensemen
AMac is a fine bottom pair dman who can do second unit PK duties and step up into 2nd pair responsibilities when an injury occurs, but that's not worth his contract. His biggest flaws are that he lets guys enter his zone too easily and is not physical AT ALL in net front battles or in post-whistle scrums. Even when his linemates are trying to stick up for a teammate who just got cheapshotted, he'll either be standing to the side or just trying to hold a guy on the other team back from getting in on the scrum.
Is he still doing that? During the last leg of his tenure with the Isles I really started noticing how extremely easily he allowed the opposing team to gain the zone.
Is he still doing that? During the last leg of his tenure with the Isles I really started noticing how extremely easily he allowed the opposing team to gain the zone.
When your best skill is shot blocking, it's going to catch up to you fast(injuries slowing you down). You could sort of see his usefulness going away a year or so before he became a UFA
Yes posters on HFboards know more than active GM's
Never change folks
He sucked his last year and half with the isles too. Philly didn't ruin him he was already bad when he got there. They just gave him that unbelievable contract.
It's actually pretty odd what happened to him. He and Hamonic were once one of the better middle defensive pairs in the NHL. He was excellent with using his stick Defensively and very positionaly sound. Then out of nowhere he just became a turnover machine and stopped making impactful plays. Supper nice guy but not a good defenseman anymore.
I'd say MacDonald and Moulson were two players that Isles fans were happy to see go.
I'm sure it happens in a lot of smaller US markets as well, and on the west coast, since the Eastern media/CDN media doesn't spend much time watching a lot of teams. If players like Oliver-Ekman Larsson, Roman Josi, Hampus Lindholm played in TOR/MTL, they would be perceived much differently.
I don't even think it's the cap hit--because at 2.5 (re-entry waivers) I think he's worth it--and yep, I think he's capable of being a 4, and in my mind was the 2nd/3rd best Dman for Philly down the stretch and in the playoffs. What I think is the tougher pill to swallow is the fact that he has a backloaded contract for four more seasons. I don't think any team would want that longterm handcuff. If he was paid up front and was owed like a mil a year for the next few seasons he'd be having a solid career on a Carolina, Colorado, or Arizona blueline.
HF is amazing for people to throw "i told you so" when they're right - and easily forget when they are dead wrong. It's a wonderful place.
There was a time when NOBODY in the media watched Isles games. It was obvious to Isles fans and how their players were described - specifically MacDonald, Moulson, Grabner, Boyes, even Mark Streit to a lesser extent.
a lot of these players were simply awful but especially after Tavares really elevated his game (season 3 - around 2011-12), a lot of big minute players (or those with good stats) started getting more attention in the media. Some were "okay" and some were truly awful.
I'd say MacDonald and Moulson were two players that Isles fans were happy to see go. Yet the media (especially the TOR media that I listen to always) were adamant that this was the Isles being cheap and how JT would never stay there if they didn't retain their top players, supporting cast, etc.
I'm sure it happens in a lot of smaller US markets as well, and on the west coast, since the Eastern media/CDN media doesn't spend much time watching a lot of teams. If players like Oliver-Ekman Larsson, Roman Josi, Hampus Lindholm played in TOR/MTL, they would be perceived much differently.
He was never good but got paid because GMs don't know how to evaluate defensemen
I agree with a lot of what you said except the bolded. MacDonald, yes, although I remember thinking we could have gotten a 1st round pick, but we were pretty happy with getting a 2nd and 3rd from Philly.
If you recall, Isles fans were pretty upset that we traded Moulson. But, these were the ones that didn't see how much he deteriorated in those short few months. He was not very good in the lockout year, and really really really really bad in the 2013 playoffs. However, some fans couldn't believe we traded JT's best buddy, a 30 goal scorer, a guy who loves the community and the kids love him. I remember talking to a ticket rep, who said they got no calls after Vanek was traded to the Islanders. If anything, more people were upset that Moulson traded. Some moms were saying "Who's my kid going to root for now?" The superficial ones were not happy that Moulson was traded.