pacde
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2004
- 85
- 0
BlackRedGold said:The issue at hand was Edmonton's idiotic claim that they couldn't compete under the previous CBA. The draft record is critical to explaining Edmonton's woes. With a good team, Edmonton would clearly see its revenues rise significantly.
As for the financial woes of Ottawa and Buffalo, they were clearly not the result of operational difficulties.
The Oilers made money last season. How much should they have made on their investment? And how much of a capital gain should they make on it if they should sell it?
But you're clearly a very childish person who has difficulty keeping up with arguments.
Sounds like you have been a hockey fan for about a week. There have been a string of good to very good NHL hockey players leaving Deadmonton for more lucrative contracts. They have tried to keep their finances on a balance and their overall ability to keep up to some of the other teams have clearly suffered. They made money last year maybe - but it cant be much and for them to ice the team they should have been able to build (if all the teams were on even footing) would be costing them something they cant afford to where they would be losing money. So your sitting there hammering them for making money - being fiscally responsible yet not getting wealthy - and yet you would like to see them take that money and blow it like a drunken sailor on all the Doug Weights and Curtis Josephs that left town. You dont know s about the history