canucks4ever
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2008
- 3,997
- 67
That's a bold statement. Are we talking pound-for-pound/based on technique or the most damaging player period? If we're talking the later, Clark would get his lunch fed to him by a guy like Chara. I think it would be the same deal with Lindros.Clark is the best fighter ever, but Lindros was huge. I'll give the edge to Clark, can't count him out.
That's a bold statement. Are we talking pound-for-pound/based on technique or the most damaging player period? If we're talking the later, Clark would get his lunch fed to him by a guy like Chara. I think it would be the same deal with Lindros.
As far as fighters, I'd put Probert, Kocur, Laraque, Chara, Boogaard, etc. ahead of Clark, without much hesitation.
Everyone feared Probert, but Probert feared Clark. Clark doesn't care how big someone was, he'd take them out.That's a bold statement. Are we talking pound-for-pound/based on technique or the most damaging player period? If we're talking the later, Clark would get his lunch fed to him by a guy like Chara. I think it would be the same deal with Lindros.
As far as fighters, I'd put Probert, Kocur, Laraque, Chara, Boogaard, etc. ahead of Clark, without much hesitation.
His wrister was elite too.Wendel Clark. Fighting was the only thing he was elite at. And devastating hits too, perhaps.