If we beat Minny and somehow Vancouver beats Nashville, when we meet on Saturday it could be for the top seed in the conference. 2 clean wins in a row and a regulation loss from Nashville and we're the top team, pending what ever the Av's and Jets do.
I see the week playing out 3-1 for us with the lone loss coming from the Oilers because Flames.
Would be the most classic flames, beat a couple division leaders, lay an egg when we play Edmonton. Tkachuk will have to have another game where he gets under the oilers goon's skin. Let the penalties role.
Hathaway probably falls under this too a little bit. Not afraid to scuff it up against anyone.2) Rats. This team has a lot of them. Matt Tkachuk is a legit rat. Sam Bennett has Rat tendencies but is also tough as nails. James Neal is a big guy who also likes to Rat. Andrew Mangiapane is low-key Ratty. Someone also underrated in terms of Rattyness? Rasmus Andersson.
2) Rats. This team has a lot of them. Matt Tkachuk is a legit rat. Sam Bennett has Rat tendencies but is also tough as nails. James Neal is a big guy who also likes to Rat. Andrew Mangiapane is low-key Ratty. Someone also underrated in terms of Rattyness? Rasmus Andersson.
2) Rats. This team has a lot of them. Matt Tkachuk is a legit rat. Sam Bennett has Rat tendencies but is also tough as nails. James Neal is a big guy who also likes to Rat. Andrew Mangiapane is low-key Ratty. Someone also underrated in terms of Rattyness? Rasmus Andersson.
One thing I mentioned at the start of the year, which is finally coming to fruition; once Calgary figures out that PP... Teams are going to be in big trouble. They have a recipe for a team that's going to get a lot of man advantages; and boy does it look like it's solved:
1) Team is built for speed. Lots of team depth with good wheels; the entire bottom 6 can motor outside of James Neal, but see below. Our entire defence when everyone's healthy is probably the most mobile D in the league. Weakest skaters? Andersson and Hamonic; they'd still skate circles around a lot of D in the league this year.
2) Rats. This team has a lot of them. Matt Tkachuk is a legit rat. Sam Bennett has Rat tendencies but is also tough as nails. James Neal is a big guy who also likes to Rat. Andrew Mangiapane is low-key Ratty. Someone also underrated in terms of Rattyness? Rasmus Andersson.
3) They have players you just want to take penalties against. Quick way to stop Johnny? Hold him, whack him, hit him in the numbers... oh wait, they're calling that this year?! ****. Dube? Oh my son, you're just so hit-able.
Things are clicking right now. Imagine when Neal starts scoring, and we get a bit more production out of the 6 through 9 forwards (Essentially 2nd line RW, and third line).
I’ve been meaning to state this for a while. Andersson is a total ****. Seriously he’s always in the middle of scrums and usually the one flapping his mouth more than anyone. He fits right in with our new core, love Ratsmus.
Not sure how many people remember it, but his very first Young Stars tournament he actually got into his first career fight (like, he never actually fought in juniors) and it was with Darnell Nurse against Edmonton. Mangiapane even commented on it after Rasmus said that he loves chirping people and getting under their skin. So even though he's not a fighter (0 fights in juniors, 1 in young stars tourney, 1 in the AHL against Curtis McKenzie who has over 40 fights in the AHL and NHL), he has shown he isn't going to back down if someone really wants to.I’ve been meaning to state this for a while. Andersson is a total ****. Seriously he’s always in the middle of scrums and usually the one flapping his mouth more than anyone. He fits right in with our new core, love Ratsmus.
We’re going 4-0.
If Vancouver holds on to win (3 goal lead with 11 minutes left, I doubt it), and we beat the Preds in regulation on Saturday and Colorado also loses in regulation on Saturday to Tampa, Flames are 1st in the Western Conference.
In short, a regulation win and a Colorado loss and we're #1 on Saturday.
Bye bye rest of Western Conference, we taking the lead and leaving you bums behind.
Gaudreau - Monahan - Neal
Bennett - Lindholm - Tkachuk
Would be an ideal top 6 if Backlund is out.
Just don’t want Peters moving Ryan up to the 2nd line, at least put Jankowski there if you have to.
Also, if the coach really likes what he sees in the Mangi-Janks-Neal line, I think Czarnick could fill in on the 1RW (and could still take right-side faceoffs like Lindholm does)Gaudreau - Monahan - Neal
Bennett - Lindholm - Tkachuk
Gaudreau - Monahan - Neal
Bennett - Lindholm - Tkachuk
Would be an ideal top 6 if Backlund is out.
Just don’t want Peters moving Ryan up to the 2nd line, at least put Jankowski there if you have to.
You think Peters is going to elevate Czarnik from popcorn eater to 2C in the span of a day? Yikes.No point in messing with the first line. The 2nd line has been great for a while now. The 3rd line appears to be developing some chemistry. Only makes sense to try Czarnik in Backlund’s spot. At the very least it gives him the opportunity to pad his point totals and increase his trade value, if we aren’t going to use him regularly.