Slapshot_11
Registered User
- Aug 30, 2006
- 6,981
- 1,625
I think the canucks shot it into themYou think they accidentally blocked 40ish shots?
I think the canucks shot it into themYou think they accidentally blocked 40ish shots?
I think the canucks shot it into them
High and wide or off Lauzon's ass.If we look around the league:
Georgiev
Hellebuyck
Skinner
Talbot
All of these goaltenders have looked shaky.
Poor goaltending alone is not an excuse.
All of those teams have been able to outscore their problems.
Where's our goals?
Or the team should stop channeling their inner alex edlerYou should probably work on thinking better.
Maybe not, but Demko doesn't let in that first softie. We wouldn't have been playing from behind going into the 2nd. Goaltending was a factor in the loss.If we can’t score more than one goal a game..and can’t convert anything on the PP ..we’re not winning…Simple as that.
And again, De Smith did not lose us that game last night..Demko has been really solid,but he’s also let in a softy in every game…Tough spot for De Smith though, as Soros has usually been the best goalie on the ice for the last half of the Preds season.
Short leash though …….IMO he gets one more start. This last game you might chalk up to nerves or just being shocked Demko is out.
If he doesn't rebound, you have to try Silovs.
no shit, you think Finn shot it at them?I think the canucks shot it into them
So you're saying the canucks inability to get pucks to the net, something that they've struggled with all year was the preds doing?no shit, you think Finn shot it at them?
This why you give Silovs a chance we need a goalie who can at least post a 900 sv pct in back to back games.Maybe not, but Demko doesn't let in that first softie. We wouldn't have been playing from behind going into the 2nd. Goaltending was a factor in the loss.
Silovs sucks and everybody asking for him is reminding me of when everyone was thinking spencer martin was a good backup because he won games even though he looked terrible in themThis why you give Silovs a chance we need a goalie who can at least post a 900 sv pct in back to back games.
I dont think Silvos is gonna be the difference maker here.
Cant win if you cant score.
If you go to Silovs now, it would be pretty awkward going back to deSmith. deSmith is 32 and Silovs just turned 23. You have to ride deSmith. Expecting a guy with 9 regular season starts in his career to carry the load is too much of an ask imo.This why you give Silovs a chance we need a goalie who can at least post a 900 sv pct in back to back games.
Peeps always need a scapegoat and pick on DeSmith rn (he's got his fair share of blame)Silovs sucks and everybody asking for him is reminding me of when everyone was thinking spencer martin was a good backup because he won games even though he looked terrible in them