AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 10,856
- 31,527
I prefer Sanderson to Drysdale, but both of them look more like potntial great #3s than a Dougie-level D. I'm not sure their upside is much more than Pesce is now and it would be at least 3-4 years off which is the end of the current core's contracts. If NJ calls up and offers #18 + #20 then I'd much prefer two of Holloway, Zary, Amirov, Borque, Gunler, Khusnutdinov, etc. over just one of Drysdale/Sanderson.
I honestly haven't seen much of Sanderson or Drysdale and don't have a strong opinion on either, have more just read what others have to say about them. Maybe I'm getting hung up a bit on handedness but I think that should factor in IF we were considering between the two of them (doubtful). Of course neither is likely to come near Dougie levels, but honestly very few prospects ever are; Dougie is a legit Norris caliber D man and is likely to get paid accordingly, so if we choose to allocate cap space differently and not pay Dougie that much then having Drysdale in the mix would be a good thing for our D going forward. Of course it's a huge downgrade from Dougie but also frees up that cap space that would've gone to Dougie for us to upgrade elsewhere. I'm really hoping we just keep Dougie, he's a great fit here and should be a core piece going forward, but until we see the pen to paper I don't think it's a guarantee.
And if we did move Dougie for other assets, I think we could still be in good shape on the right side if we drafted Drysdale and maybe signed Vatanen to fill in until he's ready. All this is just hypothetical and extremely unlikely of course, but interesting to think about.