CapitalsCupReality
It’s Go Time!!
- Feb 27, 2002
- 64,378
- 19,076
The only thing interesting is that the guy is named Damarius Bilbo.
you don’t forget a name like that lol!
The only thing interesting is that the guy is named Damarius Bilbo.
Both edge rushers repped by the same agent is interesting.The only thing interesting is that the guy is named Damarius Bilbo.
You know, if it happened a couple of times during a massage just due to random attraction, I might buy it.
But dozens of women all telling the same story about you doing skeevy crap to get them to touch your junk? And you're combing the net for new 'therapists' when most pros are probably going to stick with someone that really gets the therapeutic results they supposedly want?
Nah, bruh. u gilty.
Both edge rushers repped by the same agent is interesting.
This^^^.
Rich powerful men have a tendency to think "I can whip my junk out and stick it in your hand/face/mouth and as long as you don't run screaming out of the room, its "consensual". We've all heard the brag about "when you're a star they let you do it". I think people are finally starting to wake up to the fact that this isn't OK, but still too many of these victims are terrified to come forward, so it tends to happen in the security of a group like this.
This sounds like a pure serial predator, who thinks "they wanted this" in his mind when in their minds they are being terrorized and didn't want any of it.
I would.He seems to be living out a pretty specific fantasy. I wouldn't be surprised if there were consensual encounters mixed in with the "accidents" that ended in apologies. And the former were probably enough for him to risk the latter.
I would.
Only my opinion, but I think assuming a guy like this deludes himself about the consent is naive. I'd bet gets off on the lack of consent so the willing partners are uninteresting. But maybe.I don't mean from the accusers. I mean in general. Freakier things have happened.
These 22 women are likely the tip of the iceberg with this guy, and he probably got "lucky" somewhere along the way and justified the other stuff because of it.
Or he's just a total shit. Either way. f*** him.
Only my opinion, but I think assuming a guy like this deludes himself about the consent is naive. I'd bet gets off on the lack of consent so the willing partners are uninteresting. But maybe.
Only my opinion, but I think assuming a guy like this deludes himself about the consent is naive. I'd bet gets off on the lack of consent so the willing partners are uninteresting. But maybe.
Full-on monster as opposed to what? Just a mild predator with 22 victims or more? All I'm saying is I don't think it makes much sense to assume a guy "accidentally" misread cues 20+ times. Strikes me as more likely that he knew exactly what was going on.that’s one of many possibilities.......so you’re proclaiming full on monster before any criminal charges are even filed? If so, I sure hope they have some real evidence to prosecute if you’re right.
So their agent was also the main character from the Hobbit?The only thing interesting is that the guy is named Damarius Bilbo.
Full-on monster as opposed to what? Just a mild predator with 22 victims or more? All I'm saying is I don't think it makes much sense to assume a guy "accidentally" misread cues 20+ times. Strikes me as more likely that he knew exactly what was going on.
First off, no. I said "guys like that." In response to g00n's description. This dude, he's entitled to his day in court.meaning you have him fully convicted, it’s clear to you he’s guilty today.
you seem convinced by the ambulance chaser that’s for sure. No chance of a money grab, no chance this was his regular thing and many others happily accepted his $? Crazier things have been attempted. Why the attempt to settle before and only going public after Watson said no?
I’ll be surprised if this is as cut and dry as you’re making it out.
Full-on monster as opposed to what? Just a mild predator with 22 victims or more? All I'm saying is I don't think it makes much sense to assume a guy "accidentally" misread cues 20+ times. Strikes me as more likely that he knew exactly what was going on.
What's your issue? Of course innocent people are too often wrongly convicted and it's a travesty. And guilty people go free a lot too. The stats on sexual assault are overwhelming: most cases are never prosecuted. Are all of those accused perpetrators innocent? Probably not. Are they all guilty? Almost certainly not. Are most accusers lying? No. Will most victims get justice? Absolutely not. These are facts. I'm not "building" anything, and as I said,he's entitled to his day in court. But if that day never comes it won't mean he's innocent either.I see, we’re building the he’s guilty but there’s no proof or they can’t make a criminal case angle...burden of proof too tough to overcome. I guess the good thing is that for civil cases, the burden isn’t as high. So if he’s guilty they can get $ easier....then again if not, they can still get $ easier....then again....if his contract gets terminated, I wonder if anyone gets paid....
I just read about a guy who spent 45 years in prison, wrongfully convicted. I’ll wait for due process to work through it...
What's your issue? Of course innocent people are too often wrongly convicted and it's a travesty. And guilty people go free a lot too. The stats on sexual assault are overwhelming: most cases are never prosecuted. Are all of those accused perpetrators innocent? Probably not. Are they all guilty? Almost certainly not. Are most accusers lying? No. Will most victims get justice? Absolutely not. These are facts. I'm not "building" anything, and as I said,he's entitled to his day in court. But if that day never comes it won't mean he's innocent either.
I'm also pretty sure OJ was guilty.
This is bullshit. I haven't "convicted" him of anything. I said I'm inclined to believe women who say they've been victimized. I guess you're not. Fine.my “issue” is your presumption of guilt. You’ve already convicted him, but whatever. Let it play out is all I’m saying.
when you have to invoke OJ, things have clearly gone off the rails lol.
Watson lawyer: 'Consensual' acts did take place
I think we’ll find out there were willing participants....maybe even many of them. As someone else pointed out, this seems to be his thing, this scenario.