Yes, its true that it isn't fair that some players can play dirty and instead of being villified, their dirty play is known as a virtue. That's the way it is.
But we all have our favourite players and heroes and usually we base them on our visions of how the game should be played or the way a certain type of player plays and conducts himself.
I recognize that Gordie Howe and Mark Messier were two of the best players that ever played the game. I also recognize that Howe, Messier & others were able to be successful due to the extra room they created because of the way they played the game.
Would they have had the same success and numbers without the extra room on the ice? Maybe. They still would have been great players but maybe not to the extent that they were. Howe wasn't shadowed like Bobby Hull was. Howe was a viscious, no conscience, sneaky player that made opponents fear him. Hull was too nice in that respect (although Bryan Watson would disagree).
If I had to pick a favourite player between Howe and Hull, I take Hull for sure - because he played the game with more class. I like the tough players who stand up to aggression but also play the game within the rules.
I find it amusing when I hear people say how great Gordie Howe was and then they start talking about how Howe cut so and so for so many stitches or how he took some rookies teeth out on their first shift in the NHL.
Gordie Howe got away with so many infractions because he did the deeds from behind or with his stick or elbow. If a lesser player did those sneaky and cowardly infractions, he would be villified.
I guess Messier falls into the same category but not to the extent that Howe does.
No, my favourite players don't include the likes of Gordie Howe or Messier or other players who bent the rules by intimidating younger and smaller players.
Hull, Richard, Orr, Salming and other players had the courage to confront their opponents head on - Gordie Howe chose not to.
Trottier said:
And yes, there was a double-standard for Howe and Messier. You know why? Because they could get away with it. No one wanted to mess (pardon the pun) with either one of them. They were intimidating. Yes, a double-standard indeed; wasn't the same for most mere mortals on the ice. Life is unfair, you know?