Jannik Hansen
Registered User
- Apr 16, 2016
- 759
- 1,361
Does anyone have any shred of justification for why they took some guy I've literally never heard of over Mrazek?
Many good picks, here are the bad ones.
Brickley, Thorburn, Bellemare, Sbisa, Nosek
I don't think Bellemare is a bad decision. Their options were basically Matt Read, Michael Raffl or Dale Weise. Those players are only marginally better than Bellemare. He is a well liked player and will be fine on their 4th line. I personally would have selected Raffl if I were Vegas, but by no means was Bellemare a terrible decision.
None. Especially when you could likely flip him to Winnipeg or have him play and win games. Heck, Philly might have bitten oh Mrazek. Same with Dallas.Does anyone have any shred of justification for why they took some guy I've literally never heard of over Mrazek?
I still don't understand Theodore + Stoner instead of Manson/Vatanen + 29 other defenders better than Stoner
They have their 'face' and #1 goalie in Fleury.
Mrazek makes #1 money. IF there's no team out there willing to trade for him; then you're wasting money. I sincerely doubt that this owner wants to spend a lot of money on the team for the first few years as they blow.
Raffl>>Bellemare
I don't think Bellemare is a bad decision. Their options were basically Matt Read, Michael Raffl or Dale Weise. Those players are only marginally better than Bellemare. He is a well liked player and will be fine on their 4th line. I personally would have selected Raffl if I were Vegas, but by no means was Bellemare a terrible decision.
Does anyone have any shred of justification for why they took some guy I've literally never heard of over Mrazek?
He's awful. Good guy, absolutely terrible player