Hawkaholic
Registered User
If he is such a great coach that can make an expansion team look like world beaters how come when he coached Florida the team was still awful?Vegas was a very well-coached team. The Blackhawks are not.
If he is such a great coach that can make an expansion team look like world beaters how come when he coached Florida the team was still awful?Vegas was a very well-coached team. The Blackhawks are not.
If he is such a great coach that can make an expansion team look like world beaters how come when he coached Florida the team was still awful?
Can you show me where I defended Q or Stan, anywhere? Didn't think so./\ Some folks will make any argument to defend Q or Stan. Not biting.
The 2017-18 Las Vegas Knights were a very well coached team. I'm not talking about Florida.
That works both ways FYI...if Q is such a great coach how come he can coach a team to a Division title and then get swept? One season doesn't define a coach
If he is such a great coach that can make an expansion team look like world beaters how come when he coached Florida the team was still awful?
I don't credit coaches near as much as some others do for wins and losses.The 2017-18 Las Vegas Knights were a very well coached team. I'm not talking about Florida.
That works both ways FYI...if Q is such a great coach how come he can coach a team to a Division title and then get swept? One season doesn't define a coach
I don't credit coaches near as much as some others do for wins and losses.
Q can coach a team to a division title and lose in the first round because the team isn't near as good as it used to be.
I shouldn't have said awful..butAnd in an embarrassing fashion, no less.
Gallant wasn't the issue in Florida...
On June 21, 2014, he was named head coach of the NHL's Florida Panthers by then executive vice president and general manager, Dale Tallon.[22] In his first season, he led the Panthers to a record of 38 wins, 29 losses, 5 overtime losses, and 10 shoot-out losses for 91 points. The record was an improvement of 9 wins and 25 points over the prior season. In 2015–16, Gallant led the upstart Panthers to a 24–12–4 record at the All-Star break, earning him a spot in the all-star game as the head coach for the Atlantic Division All-Stars. The Panthers finished with a club-record 47 wins and 103 points, enough for the second division title in franchise history. For his efforts, Gallant was named as a finalist for the Jack Adams Award.[23] On November 27, 2016, Gallant was fired by new Panthers general manager Tom Rowe after posting an 11–10–1 record to start the season.
How does any of the above say that the team was awful when he coached Florida? Letting Gallant go from Florida was the dumbest thing they could have done.
I'm sure that's part of it, but the roster isn't near as good as it was 3+ years ago either, not even close.Or it can be that he didn't make any adjustments to anything in his systems/game-planning in that entire series, and just tried to go with what he had done that worked in the past against the Preds. The Preds, and the rest of the NHL, got wise to Q and how he did things. He hasn't adjusted. In 3+ years...
I shouldn't have said awful..but
Did I say Gallant was the issue?
All I am saying is he isn't some saviour as a coach. Yes, it was a dumb decision to dump him, but Gallant is not the reason they were a good team.
He's a small part of it, the players are a big part of it.He's a big part of it.
And yeah. Nothing about that is awful. Significant improvement year one. Division winner year two. Fired after starting .500 year 3....
He's a small part of it, the players are a big part of it.
I shouldn't have said awful..but
Did I say Gallant was the issue?
All I am saying is he isn't some saviour as a coach. Yes, it was a dumb decision to dump him, but Gallant is not the reason they were a good team.
Or, maybe, just maybe, the players were better than everyone thought they were? And maybe, the players ALL had a chip on their shoulder and went out and performed far beyond how the had performed in the past because of said chip.Not THE reason, sure. But I think you're being disingenuous in implying that a team full of castaways that fans almost unanimously predicted to be one of the worst teams ever, but instead made it all the way to game 5 of the SCF, got there with happenstance coaching.
Gallant was a huge reason for their success and it honestly seems like the only reason you're even making this point is because of the correlation I made with Vegas' success and the Hawks struggles with Q.
Or, maybe, just maybe, the players were better than everyone thought they were? And maybe, the players ALL had a chip on their shoulder and went out and performed far beyond how the had performed in the past because of said chip.
And they got to the SCF playing behind a brick wall, basically.
Coaching played a part, but coaching seems to always be given far too much credit or blame when things go right, or go wrong.
So everyone was wrong about every player? Yeah that sounds reasonable.
Wonder how Q might have done with that roster.
The 2017-18 Las Vegas Knights were a very well coached team. I'm not talking about Florida.
That works both ways FYI...if Q is such a great coach how come he can coach a team to a Division title and then get swept? One season doesn't define a coach
It happens
Sorta like how this boards favorite Mike Babcock had a essentially allstar team go 58-16-8 with 124 pts capturing Presidents trophy and losing to lowly 41-28-13 with 95 pts Oilers team in embarrassing fashion in 1st round
Its the biggest flop in NHL history for regular season champ
That Wing team was regarded as one of the greatest teams in history heading into that playoffs
So as you point out one season doesn't define a coach
Babcock shine is coming off quickly. It was coming off in Detroit as welll.
Right.
/\ I live in the outskirts of Toronto. I hear it all. It sounds to me like Mathews is getting a bit big headed for his own good. He probably took a temper tantrum when Tavares was signed.
Babcock is a no-nonsense coach who wants to win.