wahsnairb
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2010
- 5,240
- 2,558
Idk man you guys moved Panarin for Saad.
Anything is possibleeeeeeeee
Vancouver
Stanley Cups: 0
maybe not anythinggggggggg
Idk man you guys moved Panarin for Saad.
Anything is possibleeeeeeeee
Hughes alone would probably get Kane. He's one of the best young players in the league.Canucks need to add hughes to that package to even get Chicago to pick up the phone. that package alone from Vancouver is a net wash to dump sutter and eriksson contracts, you need to add to that to net an elite player return like Kane
you're out to lunch to decline that
You have hurt my feelingsVancouver
Stanley Cups: 0
maybe not anythinggggggggg
I'm pretty sure this package would land any 30+ year old star in the league provided his team was in a position to benefit from rebuilding. Podkolzin is a top 5-10 prospect.
like I said, the vancouver package alone is a net wash to dump the dead weight of eriksson and sutter. even in your suggestion, it's accurate that all the other pieces weigh out and it's Kane for hughesHughes alone would probably get Kane. He's one of the best young players in the league.
That’s hyperbole too. Dumping about 8.5m in real salary wouldn’t require one of the game’s best prospects, another very good one and a bubble team’s unprotected 1st. Take out Podkolzin and any rebuilding team still makes that trade immediately.like I said, the vancouver package alone is a net wash to dump the dead weight of eriksson and sutter. even in your suggestion, it's accurate that all the other pieces weigh out and it's Kane for hughes
podkolzin is not one of the games best prospects. sorry. his stock has slipped in the last two years and he did not have a great draft +1 yearThat’s hyperbole too. Dumping about 8.5m in real salary wouldn’t require one of the game’s best prospects, another very good one and a bubble team’s unprotected 1st. Take out Podkolzin and any rebuilding team still makes that trade immediately.
podkolzin is not one of the games best prospects. sorry. his stock has slipped in the last two years and he did not have a great draft +1 year
You're simply wrong. Pretty much every publication lists him as a top 10-15 prospect.podkolzin is not one of the games best prospects. sorry. his stock has slipped in the last two years and he did not have a great draft +1 year
podkolzin is not even a top 50 prospect right now and sadly that's a factYah, I mean I’ll take your opinion over people that do this for a living.
When you get better at trolling eventually you can go a lot longer without people realizing you're doing it. Three pages is a start, though.podkolzin is not even a top 50 prospect right now and sadly that's a fact
Vancouver
Stanley Cups: 0
maybe not anythinggggggggg
You're simply wrong. Pretty much every publication lists him as a top 10-15 prospect.
Russian players dominate top spots in TSN’s ranking of NHL-affiliated prospects - TSN.ca
https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-top-100-prospects-ranking/
podkolzin is not even a top 50 prospect right now and sadly that's a fact
Canucks need to add hughes to that package to even get Chicago to pick up the phone. that package alone from Vancouver is a net wash to dump sutter and eriksson contracts, you need to add to that to net an elite player return like Kane
you're out to lunch to decline that
podkolzin is not one of the games best prospects. sorry. his stock has slipped in the last two years and he did not have a great draft +1 year
Lol don't fall for this guys bait, he trys to dump seabrook at every corner too. Hawks fan in denial about where their team is headed just like their captain.LOL at thinking Vancouver would even entertain giving up Quinn Hughes to get Patrick Kane.
I assume you're just looking at the stats and have no idea that St. Petersburg plays him largely on the 4th line.
He was literally just named a top 10 prospect by the Hockey Writers, was 16th from Pronman in January.
lol at thinking you're going to get Kane AND offload a truck full of crap without giving a premium player because Kane would be head and shoulders Vancouver's best player immediatelyLOL at thinking Vancouver would even entertain giving up Quinn Hughes to get Patrick Kane.
I assume you're just looking at the stats and have no idea that St. Petersburg plays him largely on the 4th line.
He was literally just named a top 10 prospect by the Hockey Writers, was 16th from Pronman in January.
lol at thinking you're going to get Kane AND offload a truck full of crap without giving a premium player because Kane would be head and shoulders Vancouver's best player immediately
Didn't say the OP was good. But you let me know when a team EVER trades a 21 year old top pairing defenseman for a 32 year old, regardless how good he is.
Also Kane isn't a better overall hockey player than Elias Pettersson right now and there's not a team in the league who would take Kane over Pettersson right now.
LOL
Go find me any nhl player ranking that lists Pettersson ahead of Kane. (Save your time there isn’t one)
And NHL teams wanting pettersson over Kane isn’t going out on much of a limb considering one is just entering his prime.
But other than that, great post.
Stop talking. Moronic comment. What a stupid ***** uninformed post.podkolzin is not even a top 50 prospect right now and sadly that's a fact