Proposal: VAN-CHI

Discussion in 'Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk' started by Tripp Longfellow, Jul 20, 2019.

  1. Tripp Longfellow

    Tripp Longfellow Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Canada
    Sorry if this has been suggested before but Lucic for Neal got me thinking.

    Seabrook + Perlini (or a B prospect) + 2020 1st Round pick

    For

    Eriksson

    Am I way off here?
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2019
  2. canuckslover10

    canuckslover10 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Occupation:
    ear tickeler
    Ya nope not worth it the only way i see any team taking seabrook is 1 he starts playing like a beast again or 2 chicago trades dach with him
     
  3. baethoven

    baethoven Registered User

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    Chicago
    [​IMG]
     
  4. 4chanhoc

    4chanhoc Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2019
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    195
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Gender:
    Male
    I'd do it, as long as the first round pick isn't conditional.
     
    bh53 likes this.
  5. StanHull

    StanHull Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2018
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    11
    Yes you are off...take off the 1st round pick and Hawks would say yes, if not Hawks say no
     
  6. Cogburn

    Cogburn Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    758
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Vancouver
    We have to sign Boeser and Goldobin still and taking the extra 825k (plus what ever Perlini is asking for) runs contrary to that.

    The extra 2 years doesn't really fix our problem with Eriksson but pushes it back a few years. I don't think Seabrook will regress to Eriksson level this year or next but it is still a strong possibility for the final years. His play still has value as we speak but it's the length of his contract that worries me.

    We don't have room for Perlini in our line up even with Eriksson being unloaded.

    Seabrook's NMC is also troubling with the expansion draft coming up.

    It's a neat idea but in practice it does kind of lose steam from a Canucks perspective.
     
  7. canuckslover10

    canuckslover10 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Occupation:
    ear tickeler
    Thats why i dont think its gonna happen there is no incentive big enough besides dach to take seabrooks contract
     
  8. Rowlet

    Rowlet Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2018
    Messages:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    973
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Without the 1st, the Canucks absolutely do not do this deal.
     
    Bertuzzzi44 likes this.
  9. Bertuzzzi44

    Bertuzzzi44 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2018
    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    Lol That’s way to steep of a price to pay for the Hawks.
     
  10. SotasicA

    SotasicA Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    4,631
    Likes Received:
    2,437
    Trophy Points:
    126
    I'd rather Seabrook retires a Hawk and they raise up his jersey. If for nothing else than to prevent Chelios from getting honoured. Because **** Chelios.
     
    Penosity and Tripp Longfellow like this.
  11. Canadian Canuck

    Canadian Canuck Lose for Hughes #2

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    11,605
    Likes Received:
    1,743
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Kamloops BC
    Change Perlini to Boqvist and change Eriksson to Sutter and I do it.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2019
    Kevin Musto likes this.
  12. RebuildinVan

    RebuildinVan Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2017
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    489
    Trophy Points:
    59
    No way to Seabrook, higher cap hit plus two more years
     
  13. wahsnairb

    wahsnairb Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,784
    Likes Received:
    694
    Trophy Points:
    109
    i know this isn't a contrsuctive response, but...


    hahahahhahaha

    and Boqvist was mentioned? you're ****ting me hahaha this thread
     
  14. RememberTheRoar

    RememberTheRoar no cycle

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2015
    Messages:
    9,935
    Likes Received:
    5,161
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    not Milwaukee nor Nashville
    Because it took a Dach-level prospect to move Lucic, right?

    It’s fine if your team doesn’t want Seabrook, but it’s not going to take a Dach-like prospect to move him if the Hawks are taking a nearly equally bad contract back.
     
    djeck42 and WJSN like this.
  15. skyo

    skyo Benning Squad

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    3,485
    Likes Received:
    183
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    CanucksCorner
    Home Page:
    I'll take the cheaper 3yr Eriksson contract over the 5 more yrs expensive contract of Seabrook.
     
  16. SchmaltzLiquor8

    SchmaltzLiquor8 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2017
    Messages:
    2,741
    Likes Received:
    2,215
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Nucks on some next level delusional meds if they think either of Boqvist or Dach would be included.
     
    Penosity likes this.
  17. Bobby Terrance

    Bobby Terrance Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    My God Canucks fans in this thread, what planet are you guys from ?
     
    Penosity likes this.
  18. Cogburn

    Cogburn Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    9,550
    Likes Received:
    758
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Vancouver
    The planet where we don't want a worse contract without being well compensated. We can't afford Seabrook, let alone Perlini, for Eriksson (we need every cap dollar we can get for Boeser and Goldobin). Most of the posters aren't saying "this is the value" but rather there is nothing they view as an intermediate step between Perlini and a first round pick and Boquist/Dach.

    Were it Eriksson and Sutter for Seabrook, Perlini, and a first, I'd be on board, but then how does Chicago for in 10+ million in cap for overpaid players while giving up value to dump a contract for a player that still contributes?
     
  19. hawksrule

    hawksrule Odd Little Poster

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Messages:
    13,903
    Likes Received:
    1,506
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Hawks take it and run.
     
    Idionym and Canadian Canuck like this.
  20. Carnal

    Carnal Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2018
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Exactly, should be both guys...
     
  21. Boondock

    Boondock Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    365
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Canucks have zero interest in 5 more years of Seabrook. They have minus 10 interest in Seabrook at $6.875 for the next 5 years. They have minus 1000 interest in Seabrook for 5 more years at $6.875 with a NMC, and minus 100000 interest in Seabrook needing expansion protection. Three more years of LE at $6 is a steal of a deal compared to the Seabrook contract. Chicago isn’t interested in moving any asset of value with Seabrook so no deal. Nothing to see here.
     
  22. canuckslover10

    canuckslover10 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Occupation:
    ear tickeler
    Well what im essentially saying there is nothing chicago could offer besides an overpay that the canucks would take, erikssons contract is actually somewhat tradable considering the cap hit to salary ratio and why would we help chicago we clearly lose this trade seabrook imo has the worst contract in the league and if you want a rival to take it then its gonna take an overpay
     
  23. canuckslover10

    canuckslover10 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Occupation:
    ear tickeler
    Thats why it wont happen
     
  24. Thorvat

    Thorvat Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2018
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Now that looch is gone lets fine the next worse contract to dump on the Canucks. Would rather watch LE float for the next 3 years than take on the Seabrook contract.
     
  25. Bobby Terrance

    Bobby Terrance Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Most canuck fans are saying this is the value. If you seriously think Seabrook's contract is a first and a prospect worse than the biggest floater on the planet than you need to give your head a shake.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"