The blues would probably happily affiliate with a AHL team in a place like Kansas City if someone like Lamar Hunt Jr was the local owner/operator.
Centrum:
stop playing games here:
Who owns Utica, just because it was Worcester and Springfield originally... doesn't mean the Blues are being discussed here..... they have a contract with the Thunderbirds......
it has NOTHING to do with Independence or the Mavericks, who are not thrilled with Calgary, but it's doubtful as Norfolk SHOWS US being independent the last full season.
St. Louis wants nothing to do with the owner/operation business likely due to the backlash they got from handling the transfer to Peoria, whether it be publically or privately as was played out then.
now:
we knew that this might be coming at some point.... BUT now the question to Canucks Sports is do you have an operator to self sustain the operational costs now that Esche isn't footing that bill for you....
2) what franchise name hasn't been taken or trademarked for like what Esche did with 'Utica Devils' AND are we setting up another trademark fight a la Palm Desert over 'Firebirds' or the sidebar over 'Golden Knights' having multiple meanings.