Xspyrit
DJ Dorion
Well I guess you need to watch more of the games by the sounds of it to me. You even admitted to not watching the player much and followed to give an innacurate scouting report. Being above average from a hockey sense perspective at 24 years old is pretty damn good. Means he is a very versitile player that can play in any situation. Wing, center, pk, pp he has done it all this year. That is a usefull player, he has been excellent on the pk in the second half and he is over 50% in the faceoff dot which he likely improves at so he doesnt hurt you in that regard. He also has playoff experience and got to be in a locker room with proven pros in San Jose. He is a good player to have around his teamates and by all accounts is very well liked.
If you think its a comparable situation to Boro Smith and Ceci then I think ill have to go back to my first point. You need to watch him more.
I understand that the poll is not who is the most proven player at the NHL level. Its who I think will be the best, I dont see Balcers being a regular NHL player. He is not strong from a defensive stand point, he loses lots of puck battles and hasnt shown me elite top 6 offensive talent. Thats what he is, either a top 6 player or he likely isnt going to stick in an NHL lineup. So for me this was a very easy decision Tierney is a versitile effective player that can play against other teams better players. The sens have very few of these types at this point.
I said that I didn't watch all Sens hockey this year (for Melnyk reasons) but I still did watch enough to have some scouting reports. That being said, where did I "admitted to not watching the player much"? Are we talking about Tierney? I have watched enough of his NHL shifts to know how he skates, handles the puck, shoots and is positioned on the ice, as well as his general competitiveness. And Tierney is not brand new in the NHL, he played 284 games with the Sharks plus 40 in the playoffs. I knew who he was before the trade.
The fact that Tierney has an above average hockey sense is probably the only reason why he plays in the NHL. It's a pretty good thing like you said and it allows him to be more than a depth player but the rest of his skillset being very average also limits his impact. The fact that he has done things this year on THIS team doesn't mean he would have had the opportunity to do it on other teams, example what would be his role on the Lightning? Would he even make the team? This year is very contextual as the Sens traded (well, sold for futures) their best established talent (Hoffman, Karlsson, Stone, Duchene and Dzingel), the ice-time, role and opportunity he got is not something that you will see every year.
Last year on the Sharks, he played mostly with Boedker, Hansen, Donskoi, M.Karlsson, Meier and Labanc (the last 2 being players with very limited experience). This year he played with Stone, Ryan, Boedker, Tkachuk and Balcers. His PP TOI went from 0:59 to 1:42 per game even though he has only 2 PPP. In 2017-18 with the Sharks he was put more in an offensive role than the 2 years prior which is why he reached 40 pts, as he had 20 and 23 pts the 2 seasons before. This year, he has been a little bit more productive.
I'm not saying Tierney is a BAD player, I'm saying he's an average player (I said ideally your 8th/9th best forward) which is still valuable. To me, he's a player on Pageau/Kelly level, maybe a tad better offensively thanks to passing and vision/hockey sense but really not as good defensively. Look at his relative advanced stats too, not very good.
The point about Boro Smith and Ceci is that YOU said "Tierney has essentially already done that and has the trust of the management group and his coachs", nothing else. I never came close to compare the players or anything. It was related to that comment and should have been pretty clear as I highlighted that part. The fact that any player has earned trust from coaching and management means nothing in the sense that pretty much everyone on this board bash them non-stop.
All that being said, I understand if you vote him over Balcers, you have reasons to not be high on him. But the whole point of the debate wasn't that. It comes from previous threads, that many were voting Tierney because "proven" (which is wrong) or are just not high on the rest (which is understandable)
It doesn't mean I'm entirely sold on Balcers, but I don't think his "likelihood of reaching potential" is low enough to not have him over Tierney. Balcers is still 21 y/o in his 2nd pro season, Tierney is in his 5th pro season, he is much farther developed so that's something you also have to consider.
I want to build a good team, so I don't think Tierney should be anywhere close the top-6. He should be on the 3rd line max, so now it's a question of would you rather have him or Pageau as the 3rd line center?