lennor
Registered User
- Oct 15, 2019
- 357
- 343
People want Toffoli signed solely based on sunken cost fallacy
Hoffman would certainly look good on the Canucks... 5.5M x3yrs get it done Benning
We have approximately 8m in cap space right now and if we bury Sven in the minor that an extra 1 million to work with.
We have approximately 8m in cap space right now and if we bury Sven in the minor that an extra 1 million to work with.
We have approximately 8m in cap space right now and if we bury Sven in the minor that an extra 1 million to work with.
People want Toffoli signed solely based on sunken cost fallacy
You must admit, giving up a decent prospect PLUS a 2nd round draft pick in a deep draft (where you don't have a 1st round pick) is way too high a price to pay for just a rental.
Well, I happen to like how he fits with our forward group. But yes, it would be a shame to lose a pick and a prospect for 17 games of a player.People want Toffoli signed solely based on sunken cost fallacy
Team a probably lottery pick team if it just signs three minimum wage defensemen. Even with Tanev, it wasn't very good. Without him, it's horrible whenever Hughes (or Edler) isn't on the ice. And you can't expect Edler to play 82 games.True, they have ~$8M but....
They have 13 forwards, 5 defensemen, and 2 goalies signed. They'd need to sign 3 more defensemen. Even at bargain basement prices, that's $2.5M
Now there's only $5.5M of cap space left.
I don't have a second team but I love watching the Nucks and I was watching all your guys playoff games. Toffoli looked pretty good. How did you guys not offer him this contract?
Very simple. Our management chose to add $6MM Myers, $2MM Benn, $3.5MM Ferland last offseason, and $3MM Roussel $3MM Beagle $3.36MM Baertschi the year before. Not to mention still dealing with awful decisions from 2015 and 2016 in $4.375MM Brandon Sutter, $6MM Eriksson, $3.75MM Pearson (as a result of $4MM Gudbranson).