bucks_oil
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2005
- 8,327
- 4,510
Gagner blossomed early and started to suck midway. Why are we comparing the two? Benson has only gotten better.
Is this really true? Or were we just willing to accept his faults when young and we still hoped 40-50 points was going to become 60-70 in his prime.
Gagner had a pretty remarkably consistent NHL career. He just didn't progress during it (but didn't get appreciably worse either).
It was our expectations (as a future #1B C) that made us feel he was a failure.